Teams

Forever Young

Adult 55 & Over Spring · 9.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.33 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-21vs Logan 9.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRaul Sanchez / Peter Seneca vs David Blumeris / Bob Kothari2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Olson / Tom Sellig vs Richard Hoffmann / Steve Ostroff2-6, 3-6
2025-07-21vs Logan 9.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesPeter Seneca / Raul Sanchez vs Jeffrey Callan / Steve Ostroff3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesTom Sellig / Edward Hughes vs Craig Alter / Greg Eger4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-07-16vs Logan 9.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Boettcher / Thomas Gavin vs Fred Perrin / Michael Schnably1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRaul Sanchez / David Littell vs Jeffrey Callan / Steve Ostroff1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Graham / Edward Hughes vs Craig Alter / Joseph Ferry6-2, 6-4
2025-06-25vs Logan 9.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Davies / Chris Clayton vs Fred Perrin / Michael Schnably4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Gavin / James Boettcher vs Steve Ostroff / Jeffrey Callan3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJames Olson / David Graham vs Joseph Ferry / Richard Hoffmann6-7, 1-6
2025-06-11vs Logan 9.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Davies / Peter Seneca vs Greg Eger / Paul Elliott4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRaul Sanchez / David Littell vs Fred Perrin / Michael Schnably0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Boettcher / David Graham vs David Blumeris / Bob Kothari0-6, 1-6
2025-06-04vs Logan 9.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRaul Sanchez / Richard Davies vs Greg Eger / Paul Elliott1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChris Clayton / Tom Sellig vs Jeffrey Callan / Steve Ostroff1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames Olson / David Graham vs David Blumeris / Bob Kothari5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Logan 9.0061715103
2Forever Young0611734206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chris Clayton
published 4.5
David Graham
published 4.5
3.82
David Littell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Edward Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
James Boettcher
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
James Olson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Seneca
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Raul Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Richard Davies
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Gavin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tom Sellig
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Graham + Edward Hughes4454% games−1.4% vs expected
Tom Sellig + Peter Seneca224 matchesnot enough data
Raul Sanchez + Peter Seneca044 matchesnot enough data
Richard Davies + Peter Seneca033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Clayton
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
David Graham
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
David Littell
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Edward Hughes
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
James Boettcher
13W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
James Olson
20W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Seneca
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raul Sanchez
17W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Davies
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Gavin
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Sellig
15W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.