Teams

The Young & the Rest of Us

2021 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Women 8.0 - 55 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 3.88 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-19vs PearlsLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Nelson / Nancy Barber vs Marianne Nielsen / Julie Birgenheier0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Unglaub / Shelley Williams vs Sarah Miller / Margaret Moffatt3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJan DeCosse / Patti Oakes vs Willa Craig / Mary Houlihan4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-06-18vs PearlsLost 03
L#1 DoublesShelley Williams / Nancy Barber vs Marianne Nielsen / Sarah Miller2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Unglaub / Patti Oakes vs Willa Craig / Shelley Geiszler1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Nelson / Jan DeCosse vs Martha Yates / Margaret Moffatt5-7, 3-6
2021-06-18vs Miller TimeWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathy Nelson / Patti Oakes vs Nora Miller / Cheryl Scott4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJan DeCosse / Shelley Williams vs Elizabeth Barton / Gatchina Hessler6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNancy Unglaub / Nancy Barber vs Marie Neergaard / Anne Caprio7-6, 6-2
2021-06-17vs Miller TimeLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Unglaub / Patti Oakes vs Jean Clary / Colleen Green1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Barber / Jan DeCosse vs Elizabeth Barton / Gatchina Hessler4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Nelson / Shelley Williams vs Marie Neergaard / Cheryl Scott6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 8.0 - 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pearls3193892
2The Young & the Rest of Us133918131

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Shelley Williams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Jan DeCosse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Nancy Unglaub
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
2.90
Patti Oakes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kathy Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Barber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Shelley Williams
7W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Jan DeCosse
31W–24L career · 4 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Nancy Unglaub
120W–91L career · 4 lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Patti Oakes
79W–191L career · 4 lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
2.90
Kathy Nelson
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Barber
41W–53L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.