Teams

Heron Bay - Goetz

2022 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Spring Night · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.64 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-24vs Broward/ContrerasLost 02
L#2 DoublesDaniela Romay / Diana Bastias vs Samie Lesperance / Garbine de la Mora7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDIANA TSU / Esther Lem vs Monika Olimpiew / Adriana Montserrat2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-22vs Wtc- GaudreauLost 01
L#2 DoublesEsther Lem / DIANA TSU vs Lori Lyons / Catherine Land7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2022-06-15vs Dillon - CervantesLost 01
L#2 DoublesDIANA TSU / Esther Lem vs Mayte Ruano / Evelyn Daniels4-6, 4-6
2022-05-19vs Broward/ContrerasSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDIANA TSU / Esther Lem vs Paulette Janice Snagg / Kerri Paul6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiana Bastias / Daniela CASTILLO vs Nicole Banzer / Dominique Jean-Baptiste3-6, 2-6
2022-05-18vs Midtown - SilvaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDaniela CASTILLO / Diana Bastias vs Alejandra Cofino / Yrma Petersen6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesEsther Lem vs MARIANA SILVA7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2022-05-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEsther Lem / DIANA TSU vs Janice Carter / MICHELLE WEST3-6, 3-6
2022-04-27vs Wtc- GaudreauLost 01
L#1 SinglesEsther Lem vs Dana Reece2-6, 3-6
2022-04-20vs Jetc - RogersonWon 20
W#1 DoublesEsther Lem / DIANA TSU vs ISABEL Boscan / Liliana Arbelaez6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDiana Bastias / Amber Brocki vs Bethany Marten / Ivonny Brito Levy6-3, 7-6
2022-04-13Won 10
W#2 SinglesEsther Lem vs Carol Kelly6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Gina Goetz
published 4
3.75
Esther Lem
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 4
3.71
Daniela CASTILLO
published 4
3.31
Daniela Romay
published 3.5
3.04
Claudia Garcia
published 3.5
2.99
Diana Bastias
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.72
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gina Goetz + Esther Lem4170% games+16.1% vs expected
Diana Bastias + Claudia Garcia224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gina Goetz
30W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Esther Lem
63W–43L career · 8 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Daniela CASTILLO
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Daniela Romay
29W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Claudia Garcia
4W–14L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Diana Bastias
38W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Alejandra Requesens
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.