Teams

RIO DEL ORO CW8.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 8.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-19vs MILLER PK CW8.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesGrace Kwon / Cara Morgan vs Emma Patterson / Laura Newby4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCecilia Crowley / Colene Crowley vs Keiko Ichimaru / Tracy Quilala0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Crowell / Stacey Griggs vs April Larson / Jessica Peers6-4, 6-4
2025-08-31vs MILLER PK CW8.5ALost 12
L#1 DoublesAngelica Horst / Kristen Spector vs Emma Patterson / Melissa Sloan6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Kuroda / Lisa Maneggie vs Kirstin Kolpitcke / Laura Newby1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Crowell / Stacey Griggs vs Tracy Quilala / Maria Paradis6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cara Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Sara Pallas
published
4.05
Grace Kwon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Sarah Crowell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Lisa Maneggie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Gina Costello
published
3.78
Antonia Doherty
published 4
3.75
Colene Crowley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Angelica Horst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Stephanie Kuroda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kathryn Meola
published
Kristen Spector
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stacey Griggs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angelica Horst + Sarah Crowell314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cara Morgan
0W–1L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sara Pallas
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
4.20
Grace Kwon
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
Sarah Crowell
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Lisa Maneggie
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
Gina Costello
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.81
4
Antonia Doherty
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Colene Crowley
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Angelica Horst
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Stephanie Kuroda
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Kathryn Meola
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Spector
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Griggs
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.