Teams

FREMONT HILLS CC 40MX6.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX6.0

33 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#2 DoublesForrest Liau / Debbie Liu vs Edgar Ugarte / Yukako Yamazaki6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNina Ye / Anand Kannan vs Jiye Wu / Tess Byler6-4, 7-6
W#1 DoublesNicole Borau / Chris Ling vs Daniel Morris / Stacey Wu-Savard6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRichard Chatwin / Kathleen Estreich vs Lindy Brauner / Edgar Ugarte6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJenny Peck / Warren Yang vs Rikko Field / Eric Byler6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 30 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Chris Ling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.35
Rebecca Gyr
published
3.34
Jenny Peck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Pookie Kochatchawan
published
3.16
Daniel Houlbrook
published 3.5
3.15
Chris Estreich
published 3
3.08
Karen Schutten
published
3.07
Nina Ye
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Robert Claassen
published
3.05
Anne Gabrys
published 3
3.02
Jung Yoon
published
2.97
Chi Buckley
published 3
2.96
Jillian Draeger
published
2.88
Tim Fitzgibbon
published
2.86
Kathleen Estreich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Forrest Liau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Angela Akiyama
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Elaine Chong
published
2.77
Wendy McDowell
published
2.73
Warren Yang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Debbie Liu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Nicole Borau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Joanna Berry
published
2.68
2.67
Anand Kannan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Kei Worry
published
2.59
Tommy Vargas
published
2.50
Gilda Foss
published
2.44
Shab Nemati
published
2.20
Betsy Schmitt
published 2.5
Jeff Draeger
published
Rajesh Ambati
published
Richard Chatwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Forrest Liau + Debbie Liu7261% gamesnot enough data
Richard Chatwin + Kathleen Estreich404 matchesnot enough data
Elaine Chong + Tim Fitzgibbon303 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Houlbrook + Karen Schutten303 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Houlbrook + Betsy Schmitt213 matchesnot enough data
Warren Yang + Jung Yoon303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Ling
33W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Rebecca Gyr
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Jenny Peck
28W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Pookie Kochatchawan
21W–31L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Daniel Houlbrook
22W–16L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Chris Estreich
17W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.15
Karen Schutten
35W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Nina Ye
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Robert Claassen
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Anne Gabrys
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Jung Yoon
21W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.02
3
Chi Buckley
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Jillian Draeger
29W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.96
Tim Fitzgibbon
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Kathleen Estreich
19W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.86
Forrest Liau
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Angela Akiyama
24W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Elaine Chong
42W–27L career · no lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.79
Wendy McDowell
25W–23L career · no lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.77
Warren Yang
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Debbie Liu
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Nicole Borau
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%8%92%
2.70
Joanna Berry
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.69
3
Alexey Kalinichenko
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Anand Kannan
7W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Kei Worry
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Tommy Vargas
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Gilda Foss
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
Shab Nemati
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%68%32%
2.44
2.5
Betsy Schmitt
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Jeff Draeger
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rajesh Ambati
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Chatwin
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.