Teams

V - Westlake Athletic Club

2023 USTA Adult 40 &Over - Ventura WE · V - Men 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#3 DoublesDouglas Johnson / William Ries vs Danny Everett / Peter DiPasquale3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-26vs V - Las Posas GentlemenWon 10
W#2 DoublesBryan Quoc Nguyen / Douglas Johnson vs William Dobbins / Peter Lassen6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-25vs V - Mission Oaks WarriorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesDouglas Johnson / Jeffrey Tseng vs Andre Bati / Steve Sylvers6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-18vs V - North RanchWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatt Seegers / Douglas Johnson vs Bill Sutman / Ali Motamedi1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-05vs V - Mission Oaks WarriorsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatt Seegers / Douglas Johnson vs Matthew Dawe / Jeffrey Young6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-02-18vs V - North RanchWon 10
W#2 DoublesDouglas Johnson / Matt Seegers vs John Lyon / Brian Niehaus6-0, 6-4
2023-02-11vs V - Sunset HillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDouglas Johnson / Matt Seegers vs Fuat Doymaz / Ernie Sandlin7-6, 7-6
2023-01-22vs V - Spanish Hills Mas Serve AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Tseng / Douglas Johnson vs Jon Boring / Brooks Marshall3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Jeffrey Tseng
published
4.00
MARK NIETO
published
3.98
3.45
Lucas Chilczuk
published
3.41
Chris Takami
published 3.5
3.38
Curtis Cutting
published 3.5
3.33
Douglas Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Christian Ruitberg
published 3.5
3.19
Ardy Afshar
published 3.5
3.10
Todd Isroelit
published
Steven Bleier
published
William Ries
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Curtis Cutting + Douglas Johnson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Tseng
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
MARK NIETO
13W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Bryan Quoc Nguyen
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%44%
3.98
Lucas Chilczuk
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Chris Takami
29W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Curtis Cutting
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Douglas Johnson
70W–61L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Christian Ruitberg
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Ardy Afshar
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Todd Isroelit
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Steven Bleier
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Ries
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.