Teams

Catherine Williams-YTC-18+-6.5-Combo

2025 Auburn USTA 18 & Over Combo · 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-02vs Annagail Holton-YTC-18+-6.5-ComboWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarissa Rozman / Kelley Burke vs Annagail Holton / Starr Daniels2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Williams / Lindsay Norris vs Grace Wright / Tracy Parsons6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesErin Ainsworth / Margaret Williamson vs Johanna Radtke / Caitlin FitzSimons6-3, 6-4
2025-09-25vs Annagail Holton-YTC-18+-6.5-ComboLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarissa Rozman / Beth Huddleston vs Isabella Fiorenzo / Tracy Parsons4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKate Finkel / Lisa Melton-Farmer vs Caitlin FitzSimons / Laura Schmitt6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVertrina Grubbs / Jeanette Hart vs Julie Cullins / Valerie Bennett1-6, 4-6
2025-09-11vs Jennifer Milton-YTC-18+-6.5-ComboLost 12
W#1 DoublesErin Ainsworth / Lindsay Norris vs Ingrid Gamboa / Lisa Jorgensen6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPaige Ellison-Smith / Jeanette Hart vs Jennifer Chancey / Mihee Park0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMargaret Williamson / Vertrina Grubbs vs Carrie Belsito / Monika Kolwaite6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Jennifer Milton-YTC-18+-6.5-ComboLost 12
W#1 DoublesCatherine Williams / Lindsay Norris vs Mallory Waller / Jennifer Chancey6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesErin Ainsworth / Kate Finkel vs Belinda Russell / Jennifer Milton6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKate Wu / Lisa Melton-Farmer vs Patricia Stevenson / Mihee Park1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Marissa Rozman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.96
Catherine Williams
published 3.5
2.78
Lindsay Norris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Erin Ainsworth
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.77
Beth Huddleston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Lisa Melton-Farmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Margaret Williamson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Laura Beth Jones
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.52
Kate Wu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Paige Ellison-Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Kate Finkel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.12
Kelley Burke
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jeanette Hart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Vertrina Grubbs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Williamson + Kate Finkel4642% games−3.8% vs expected
Erin Ainsworth + Lindsay Norris4166% gamesnot enough data
Erin Ainsworth + Margaret Williamson404 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Melton-Farmer + Kate Wu213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Melton-Farmer + Lindsay Norris303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marissa Rozman
37W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.17
3.5
Catherine Williams
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Lindsay Norris
29W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.78
Erin Ainsworth
20W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.77
3
Beth Huddleston
11W–5L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Lisa Melton-Farmer
28W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%13%87%
2.66
Margaret Williamson
25W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.59
Laura Beth Jones
16W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.57
Kate Wu
15W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
0%43%57%
2.52
Paige Ellison-Smith
3W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
Kate Finkel
15W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
Kelley Burke
10W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Jeanette Hart
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vertrina Grubbs
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.