Teams

CCC RED

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-06vs KC-RH REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatti Knepper / Trina Jablonsky vs Lisa McNeal / Renee Martinez6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2023-08-30vs KC-CC ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesTonya Mazurek / Patti Knepper vs Suzy Farrell / Pamela Kennel6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJulie Shaw / Leah Sherwood vs Ann Gallagher / Gail Heitland6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-23vs BCST GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesTonya Mazurek / Mikelle Smith vs Michelle Harvey / Judith Wallach6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatti Knepper / Leah Sherwood vs Mary Mucilli / Kimberly Lange6-3, 6-0
2023-08-16vs GR REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesMikelle Smith / Josephine Huelskamp vs Celia Finnegan / Kelly Meilstrup6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-08-09vs NJ YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesTrina Jablonsky / Janette Wenger vs Tara Hammar / Mollie Toth0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTonya Mazurek / Mikelle Smith vs Lisa Moore / Denise Champion3-6, 3-6
2023-08-02vs BM REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanette Wenger / Trina Jablonsky vs Kimberly Sperry / Kimberly Picchietti6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJosephine Huelskamp / Patti Knepper vs Neha Sitole / Diana Collins6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-07-26vs PH PINKWon 10
W#1 DoublesTrina Jablonsky / Mikelle Smith vs Jennifer Fahey / Margo Livadariu6-0, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Mikelle Smith
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Ashley Ruger
published 3
2.79
Emma Katubig
published
2.75
Patti Knepper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.72
Leah Sherwood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Janette Wenger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Josephine Huelskamp
published
Michele Crowley
published
Trina Jablonsky
published
Wendy How
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janette Wenger + Leah Sherwood2351% games−2.4% vs expected
Janette Wenger + Mikelle Smith2448% gamesnot enough data
Patti Knepper + Janette Wenger033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mikelle Smith
83W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Ashley Ruger
18W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Emma Katubig
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Patti Knepper
59W–101L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Leah Sherwood
43W–41L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Janette Wenger
67W–84L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Josephine Huelskamp
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michele Crowley
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Trina Jablonsky
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy How
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.