Teams

IE-MTC-Shelter

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-09vs IECanyon Lake-BoyanLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Cloyd / Nicole Hollowell vs Dana Boyan / CHARLOTTE DEHESA3-6, 4-6
2025-10-26vs IE-Vista Murrieta-BolandWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Hollowell / Rebecca Cloyd vs Risa Chung / Elvia Quintana6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-18vs IECanyon Lake-BoyanLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Cloyd / Nicole Hollowell vs Rhianna Thompson / Karin Ward6-7, 3-6
2025-10-12vs IE-LLW-CCCC-HebertLost 01
L#1 DoublesErin Cartee / Rebecca Cloyd vs Ashley Knoblach / Christie Boniface2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Heather Toth
published
3.74
Rebecca Cloyd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Erin Cartee
published
3.64
Nicole Hollowell
published
3.63
Amanda Will
published 4
3.60
Kelsey Cane
published
3.60
Judy Henning
published
3.49
Michaella Deshaw
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.48
Sandra Moya
published
3.48
Denise Radogna
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Savannah Llado
published
3.27
Elizabeth Bentley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Mary Ann Neder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Cloyd + Nicole Hollowell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Toth
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Rebecca Cloyd
92W–94L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Erin Cartee
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Nicole Hollowell
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Amanda Will
0W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
Kelsey Cane
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Judy Henning
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.60
3.5
Michaella Deshaw
55W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Sandra Moya
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Denise Radogna
10W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Savannah Llado
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
Elizabeth Bentley
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Mary Ann Neder
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.