Teams

IE-Bear Creek-Bella Chicas-DeuceHaggerty

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over - IE · IE Women 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesJudy Alexander / Linda Hockenbery vs Lori Borresen / Aneta Duvall2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-01vs IE-LLW-Andulka-Silver Smashers-HaoLost 02
L#1 DoublesJudy Alexander / Linda Hockenbery vs Donna Crow / Rei Spickelmier3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Boudreaux-Haggerty / Cathy Williams vs Sesilie Kay / Alejandrina Martinez3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesJudy Alexander / Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty vs Aide Abelsky / Jane Bailey-Sease5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-05-10vs IE-LLW-Andulka-Silver Smashers-HaoLost 01
L#1 DoublesDanielle Boudreaux-Haggerty / Heidi Schumaker vs Denise Stewart / Donna Crow2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDanielle Boudreaux-Haggerty / Linda Hockenbery vs Aide Abelsky / Kathleen Leonard1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Judy Alexander
published
2.58
Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.52
Lois Krejci
published
2.52
Heidi Schumaker
published
2.49
Danna Cobbe
published 2.5
2.38
Linda Hockenbery
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.21
Michelle Fogal
published
2.17
Patricia Stephens
published
Susan Britton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Hockenbery + Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judy Alexander
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.79
3
Danielle Boudreaux-Haggerty
19W–83L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
Lois Krejci
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%43%57%
2.52
Heidi Schumaker
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%45%55%
2.52
2.5
Danna Cobbe
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%52%48%
2.49
3
Linda Hockenbery
34W–106L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Michelle Fogal
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Patricia Stephens
3W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Susan Britton
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.