Teams

Byrd/OSTC

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over-GC · Men 7.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 9 7:00 PM
Ocean Springs City Tennis Center
Sep 16 7:00 PM
vs
Ocean Springs City Tennis Center
Sep 23 7:30 PM
Biloxi Tennis Complex
Sep 30 7:00 PM
Ocean Springs City Tennis Center
2026-09-02vs Biloxi - McCarrollLost 03
L#1 DoublesWilliam Mitchell / Bruce Pate vs Tristan Bourcy / Damien Colbet1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesWilliam Troutman / Kevin Martin vs James Merritt / Wayne Dinh2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesReuben Byrd / Lennon Rea vs Ryan Canon / Drew Adams6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2026-08-11vs BBTC - Hutch 18+ 7.5 comboLost 03
L#1 DoublesReuben Byrd / Lennon Rea vs Ryland Buford / Seth Hester0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Martin / Bruce Pate vs Fant Walker / Jeffrey Ward2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Rogers / William Troutman vs Johnny Hisaw / Ethan Thomas0-6, 1-6
2026-08-03vs BBTC - Matthews/ScafideLost 03
L#1 DoublesReuben Byrd / William Troutman vs Anthony Scafide / Pierce Weatherly4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Martin / Bruce Pate vs Jeff Descher / Corey Creel5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDoug Nash / Richard Rogers vs Matthew Brashier / Thiery Hicks5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Men 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTC - Hutch 18+ 7.5 combo103005
2Biloxi - McCarroll1030121
3BBTC - Matthews/Scafide1030125
4TOCC 7.5 Men 18+0103635
5Byrd/OSTC02061273

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Duane Mcpeek
published
3.59
Doug Nash
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
William Troutman
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Bruce Pate
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Reuben Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lennon Rea
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Troutman + Bruce Pate1452% games+0.9% vs expected
Lennon Rea + Reuben Byrd1436% gamesnot enough data
Reuben Byrd + Duane Mcpeek213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Duane Mcpeek
12W–12L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Doug Nash
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
William Troutman
22W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Bruce Pate
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Reuben Byrd
30W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Lennon Rea
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.