Teams

KY/LOU/RILEY

2026 USTA ADULT 55 & Over LOUISVILLE · 3.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-14vs KY 3.0M 55 & Over (Athanasakes)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDuane Riley / Johan Samuelsson vs Michael Settles / Dean Hedges0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Ellis / Thomas de Lancey vs Richard Cotton / John Hall3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Meyer / Christopher Park vs John Hooker / Sam Garas5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-08vs KY 3.0M 55 & Over (Athanasakes)Split 11
L#1 DoublesJohan Samuelsson / Saurabh Shah vs Richard Cotton / Harry Clegg Jr4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesThomas de Lancey / Shudun Liu vs Jay Watson / George Athanasakes4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-02-27vs KY 3.0M 55 & Over (Athanasakes)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSaurabh Shah / Ernest Dreher vs Sam Garas / Robert Gunnell6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesThomas de Lancey / Shudun Liu vs George Athanasakes / David Hitt6-1, 6-2
2026-02-22vs KY 3.0M 55 & Over (Athanasakes)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJohan Samuelsson / Paul Jordan vs Harry Clegg Jr / Richard Cotton6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesShudun Liu / Ernest Dreher vs Sam Garas / John Hooker7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesThomas de Lancey / David Ellis vs John Hall / JEFF WHORTON6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-13vs KY 3.0M 55 & Over (Athanasakes)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSaurabh Shah / Ernest Dreher vs Michael Settles / Sam Garas6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesThomas de Lancey / David Ellis vs John Hall / Richard Cotton6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohan Samuelsson / Robert Rettger vs David Hitt / Robert Gunnell6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2026-02-08vs KY 3.0M 55 & Over (Athanasakes)Won 21
L#1 DoublesSaurabh Shah / Christopher Park vs John Hall / John Hooker5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJohan Samuelsson / Thomas de Lancey vs George Athanasakes / Robert Gunnell6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Rettger / David Ellis vs Dean Furman / JEFF WHORTON4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-01-31vs KY 3.0M 55 & Over (Athanasakes)Won 21
L#1 DoublesTony Hall / Saurabh Shah vs Michael Settles / Harry Clegg Jr6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohan Samuelsson / Richard Meyer vs John Hall / Sam Garas6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDuane Riley / Kevin Berry vs Dean Furman / Robert Gunnell6-4, 6-2
2026-01-17vs KY 3.0M 55 & Over (Athanasakes)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTony Hall / Saurabh Shah vs Richard Cotton / Harry Clegg Jr6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristopher Park / David Ellis vs George Athanasakes / John Hooker2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobert Rettger / Johan Samuelsson vs David Hitt / JEFF WHORTON3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Michael Dees
published
2.89
Ernest Dreher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Richard Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Paul Jordan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Saurabh Shah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Thomas de Lancey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Duane Riley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Shudun Liu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Johan Samuelsson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.75
Tony Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Matthew Stone
published
2.57
Robert Rettger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Christopher Park
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
George Goepfrich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Saurabh Shah + Johan Samuelsson3256% gamesnot enough data
Richard Meyer + Johan Samuelsson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Dees
8W–4L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Ernest Dreher
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
Richard Meyer
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Paul Jordan
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.86
Saurabh Shah
14W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
Thomas de Lancey
6W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Duane Riley
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Shudun Liu
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Johan Samuelsson
11W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Tony Hall
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Matthew Stone
2W–14L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Robert Rettger
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57
3
Christopher Park
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
George Goepfrich
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.