Teams

GEPTA/55&over/6.0W/Arreola/EPTC#3

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Eufemia Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Gabriela Stoiber
usually #2 Doubles 37%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Graciela Saenz
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published
Kati Hunyadi
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Laura Odell
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Leidiana Baca
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Magdlyn St-Cyr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Mary Chavez
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Michele Zerah
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Monica de la Torre
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Patricia Arreola
usually #3 Doubles 48%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Raquel Sanchez
usually #1 Singles 47%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Sara Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Veronica Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica de la Torre + Patricia Arreola61145% games−5.9% vs expected
Maria del Carmen Ledezma + Sara Blanco61045% gamesnot enough data
Graciela Saenz + Veronica Gonzalez8653% gamesnot enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker + Patricia Arreola8461% gamesnot enough data
Mary Chavez + Monica de la Torre5550% gamesnot enough data
Monica de la Torre + Laura Odell5549% gamesnot enough data
Eufemia Garcia + Sara Blanco0931% gamesnot enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker + Laura Odell5357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eufemia Garcia
81W–125L career · 32 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gabriela Stoiber
63W–57L career · 27 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
61W–87L career · 30 lines in 2025
not enough data
Graciela Saenz
50W–58L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kati Hunyadi
76W–65L career · 42 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Odell
50W–41L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leidiana Baca
23W–34L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Magdlyn St-Cyr
12W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
22W–47L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Chavez
18W–14L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Zerah
13W–43L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica de la Torre
39W–41L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Arreola
45W–59L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raquel Sanchez
11W–6L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Blanco
48W–69L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
Veronica Gonzalez
48W–70L career · 27 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.