Teams

OX-Dobbs

2026 Anniston · Gadsden

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShannon Thomas / Karen Estes vs Rebecca Sims / Allison York3-6, 4-6
2025-09-14vs AN-SimsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMagen Bearden / Karen Estes vs Carolyne Marsh / Hayley Loeken1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Gadsden
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OX-Dobbs3153773
2AN-Sims13351081

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Kim Tipton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Angela Weissgerber
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.42
Karen Estes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Sewell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Magen Bearden
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Magen Bearden + Angela Weissgerber2346% gamesnot enough data
Angela Weissgerber + Karen Estes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Tipton
16W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.03
3
Angela Weissgerber
11W–17L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
Karen Estes
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.42
Karen Sewell
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Magen Bearden
10W–8L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.