Teams

EFSC - Woods

2026 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.83 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-19vs Fee - PriorWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrenda Tarquinio / Katherine Plescow vs Dharshini Yogendra / Nicole Kendrick6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCyndi Mcdougall / Chonda Rodrigo-butler vs Inez Prior / Natalie Happ6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Lasko / DeAnn Barksdale vs Ashley St Vil / Margaret Kendrick6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Julia Tulloch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Renee Jiannine
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Katharyn Luer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Rachel Gould
published
2.75
Brenda Tarquinio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Allison Moorhead
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Stephanie Lasko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Cyndi Mcdougall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Lael Woods
published
2.48
Chonda Rodrigo-butler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.41
Tammy Bertolini
published
2.36
Anna Marie Pippett
published 2.5
2.35
DeAnn Barksdale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Linda Mesnard
published
2.18
Michelle Kne
published
Katherine Plescow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katharyn Luer + Renee Jiannine13659% games+11.2% vs expected
Lael Woods + Stephanie Lasko1440% gamesnot enough data
Lael Woods + Brenda Tarquinio213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Julia Tulloch
97W–101L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Renee Jiannine
104W–89L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Katharyn Luer
158W–172L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
Rachel Gould
9W–8L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Brenda Tarquinio
22W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Allison Moorhead
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Stephanie Lasko
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
3
Cyndi Mcdougall
19W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Lael Woods
18W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
2.5
Chonda Rodrigo-butler
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
Tammy Bertolini
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Anna Marie Pippett
5W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
DeAnn Barksdale
1W–10L career · type M · 1 line in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Linda Mesnard
13W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.35
Michelle Kne
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Katherine Plescow
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.