Teams

GJTC LSHARP

2021 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - WS · MIXED 8.5 - ITA - WS

9 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-09-08vs GJTC LSMITHWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Alano / Denise Faber vs Brian Ballard / Briana Lister6-2, 7-6
2021-08-18vs GJTC PDANIELSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdam Hochevar / Julie Faber vs Clint Davis / Carrie Thornton3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristina Ausband / Brian Wright vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Wright / Christina Ausband vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-11vs GJTC LSMITHSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDenise Faber / Luis Vargas Herrera vs Heather Hughes / Brian Ballard3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Faber / Adam Hochevar vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-05vs GJTC LSMITHSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChristina Ausband / Brian Wright vs Amy Espinoza-Hurshman / Randy Hurshman5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Faber / Adam Hochevar vs Dana Elliott / Colby Grace6-1, 6-4
2021-07-28vs GJTC PDANIELSWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulie Faber / Adam Hochevar vs Bryan Baughman / Lisa Poudrier3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-21vs GJTC LSMITHLost 01
L#2 DoublesEvan Wilson / Christina Ausband vs Brian Ballard / Briana Lister5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2021-07-15vs GJTC PDANIELSSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDenise Faber / Luis Vargas Herrera vs Matt Miller / Carrie Thornton3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Faber / Adam Hochevar vs Tara Marshall / Daniel MacDonald6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.5 - ITA - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Christina Ausband
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Brian Alano
published 4.5
4.10
Julie Faber
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.90
Kelley Henke
published
3.86
Tammy Hopkins
published
3.77
Lisa Sharp
published
3.73
Denise Faber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Adam Hochevar
published
Evan Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Alano + Julie Faber7161% games+2.7% vs expected
Adam Hochevar + Julie Faber3259% gamesnot enough data
Adam Hochevar + Denise Faber3249% gamesnot enough data
Brian Alano + Denise Faber123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Ausband
39W–30L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Brian Alano
22W–18L career · type M · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Julie Faber
82W–48L career · 5 lines in 2021
21%78%<1%
4.10
Kelley Henke
67W–22L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
Tammy Hopkins
41W–28L career · no lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
3.86
Lisa Sharp
46W–41L career · no lines in 2021
96%4%<1%
3.77
4
Denise Faber
105W–96L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Adam Hochevar
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Evan Wilson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.