Teams

McGuire/40s/3.5/SC

2026 Man · Cov Mixed 40 & Over

18 players · average NTRP 3.31 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Alysha Schroeder
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.41
Brandon Migliore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.40
Chris Corkern
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 3.5
3.35
Christine Vincent
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.18
Brandon Beyl
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Brian Darr
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.78
Amy Boehm
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Allen Amir Parvizian
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Donald Rigaud
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jamie McWilliams
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published
Kimberly Darr
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Biggs
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Paul Roy
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Ryan Nash
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Stephanie Nash
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Suzanne Roy
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Tracy Pourciau
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Ty McGuire
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Darr + Brian Darr5251% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Pourciau + Melissa Biggs3255% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Pourciau + Ty McGuire4160% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Nash + Stephanie Nash3257% gamesnot enough data
Amy Boehm + Allen Amir Parvizian213 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Biggs + Jamie McWilliams033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alysha Schroeder
18W–15L career · type A · 28 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Brandon Migliore
27W–6L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Chris Corkern
14W–6L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Christine Vincent
7W–8L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Brandon Beyl
26W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Brian Darr
20W–18L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Amy Boehm
6W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Allen Amir Parvizian
23W–23L career · 21 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Donald Rigaud
25W–7L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jamie McWilliams
29W–17L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Darr
46W–26L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melissa Biggs
15W–24L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paul Roy
26W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ryan Nash
11W–16L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Nash
28W–16L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzanne Roy
12W–4L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tracy Pourciau
44W–26L career · 31 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ty McGuire
13W–15L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.