Teams

IRMSL/Palma/40&Over4.0W

2025 IRMSL Adult 40 & Over Night · 4.0 Women-WedN

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-19vs Quail/SoutherlyWon 10
W#2 DoublesPamela Houri / Lori Glaspey vs Lynn Southerly / Wendy Orthober6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesSandy Palma / Dina Cummings vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-05vs NRS/LoveraLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Glaspey / Pamela Houri vs Christina Lovera / Sharon DeGaetano2-6, 2-6
2025-02-12vs NRS/LoveraLost 01
L#2 DoublesSandy Palma / Lori Glaspey vs Rebecca Fulper / Lisa Thiesen2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-05vs Quail/SoutherlyWon 20
W#1 DoublesLori Glaspey / Pamela Houri vs Arianne George / Stacy Hockenhull6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSandy Palma / Beth Daly vs Kathy Fennell / Heather MacIntyre6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-01-29vs Boulevard/HazeltonWon 10
W#3 DoublesSandy Palma / Beth Daly vs Patty Raby / Marta Gannon6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-01-24vs NRS/LoveraLost 02
L#1 DoublesPamela Houri / Lori Glaspey vs Christina Lovera / Sharon DeGaetano2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Palma / Dina Cummings vs Carolyn Strong / Susan Gore5-7, 5-7
2025-01-08vs Boulevard/HazeltonWon 10
W#2 DoublesSandy Palma / Lori Glaspey vs Rachael McLaurin / Leslie London7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women-WedN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Dina Cummings
published
3.81
Lori Glaspey
published
3.74
Pamela Houri
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Regan Chatel
published
3.70
Sandy Palma
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Beth Daly
published 4
Daniela Potter
published 3.5
Elisabeth Smith
published
Meridith Brady
published
Penny Boulden
published
Tanya Mikel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Houri + Lori Glaspey9461% games+10.8% vs expected
Sandy Palma + Pamela Houri6163% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Palma + Dina Cummings7064% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Houri + Dina Cummings404 matchesnot enough data
Penny Boulden + Sandy Palma213 matchesnot enough data
Regan Chatel + Dina Cummings303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dina Cummings
17W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.99
Lori Glaspey
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.81
Pamela Houri
64W–67L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.74
Regan Chatel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.71
Sandy Palma
119W–104L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.70
4
Beth Daly
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Daniela Potter
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Elisabeth Smith
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marie-Paule Cafmeyer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Meridith Brady
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Penny Boulden
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tanya Mikel
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.