Teams

OP-Wilk/Phillips (55s 6.5W C)

2025 Neuse River Combo 55 & Over · 55s 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-08vs BW-Roberson (55s 6.5W C)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTracy Wilkinson / Annita Best vs Margaret Boles / Christie Teaney2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatherine Williams / Susan Hardison vs Linda Roberson / Kelly Varnell6-1, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLori Baker / Lulu Conekin vs Sharon Christian / Veda Moore3-6, 6-5
2025-09-25vs Emerald-Smith (55s 6.5W C)Won 30
W#1 DoublesDonna McNeill / Annita Best vs Diane Pons / Terry Shoup6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJane Crowley / Kathryn Custer vs Doreen Hyet / Yvonne Kleiman7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatricia Sena-Bolding / Pam Taylor vs Jean Herscovici / Jenny Dempsey6-3, 6-3
2025-09-20vs BW-Roberson (55s 6.5W C)Won 21
L#1 DoublesTracy Wilkinson / Annita Best vs Margaret Boles / Paige Anderson5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSandy Phillips / Susan Hardison vs Kathy Garren / Laura Sweet6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDebra Johann / Kathryn Custer vs Tina Brandalik / Julie Warren6-2, 6-2
2025-09-11vs Emerald-Smith (55s 6.5W C)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSandy Phillips / Katherine James vs Doreen Hyet / Rachel Smith6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJane Crowley / Susan Hardison vs Lisa Zurawski / Susan Moore6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKatherine Williams / Lulu Conekin vs Diane McKeel / Ann Game5-7, 4-6
2025-09-04vs Emerald-Smith (55s 6.5W C)Won 21
L#1 DoublesMariana Goldstein / Katherine James vs Doreen Hyet / Rachel Smith7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJane Crowley / Kathryn Custer vs Lisa Zurawski / Susan Moore6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna McNeill / Susan Hardison vs Diane McKeel / Yvonne Kleiman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-28vs Emerald-Smith (55s 6.5W C)Won 30
W#1 DoublesSandy Phillips / Susan Hardison vs Diane McKeel / Susan Moore6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTracy Wilkinson / Katherine James vs Lisa Zurawski / Ann Game6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDebra Johann / Kathryn Custer vs Gayle Daras / Yvonne Kleiman6-0, 6-0
2025-08-22vs BW-Roberson (55s 6.5W C)Won 30
W#1 DoublesDebra Johann / Kathryn Custer vs Margaret Boles / Christie Teaney6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTracy Wilkinson / Annita Best vs Tina Brandalik / Laura Sweet6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKatherine Williams / Katherine James vs Karen Barondes / Veda Moore6-4, 6-4
2025-08-16vs BW-Roberson (55s 6.5W C)Won 30
W#1 DoublesSandy Phillips / Susan Hardison vs Margaret Boles / Paige Anderson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTracy Wilkinson / Annita Best vs Sharon Christian / Laura Sweet6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMariana Goldstein / Katherine James vs Linda Roberson / Suzanne Lea6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55s 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Sandy Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Debra Johann
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.18
Mariana Goldstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Donna McNeill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Katherine James
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.08
Annita Best
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.00
Susan Hardison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Patricia Sena-Bolding
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Kathryn Custer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Lulu Conekin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Lori Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Crowley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Hardison + Annita Best9176% games+12.0% vs expected
Katherine James + Mariana Goldstein2450% games−5.1% vs expected
Susan Hardison + Katherine James404 matchesnot enough data
Susan Hardison + Lulu Conekin404 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Phillips + Mariana Goldstein404 matchesnot enough data
Susan Hardison + Kathryn Custer213 matchesnot enough data
Susan Hardison + Sandy Phillips303 matchesnot enough data
Donna McNeill + Sandy Phillips213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandy Phillips
46W–21L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Debra Johann
22W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
Mariana Goldstein
30W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Donna McNeill
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Katherine James
18W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.12
3
Annita Best
30W–8L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.08
Susan Hardison
33W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Patricia Sena-Bolding
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Kathryn Custer
13W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
2.93
Lulu Conekin
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Lori Baker
26W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.67
Jane Crowley
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.