Teams

Return of the Wu

2025 Tri-Level League · Men 5.0, 4.5, 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.31 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-13vs Bandit EliteLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristian Broaddus / Jeffrey Chang vs Travis Wagner / Dennis Boisseau2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCoby Heimann / Landon Blair vs Jeff Schmidgall / Peter Trang6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-12vs Bandit EliteLost 02
L#1 DoublesThomas Kennedy / Kristian Broaddus vs Chad Nguyen / Estanislado Martinez2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDerrick Kinsey / Coby Heimann vs Ignacio Rivera / Jeff Schmidgall5-7, 5-7
2024-10-11vs Game OnWon 10
W#1 DoublesMario Morales / Landon Blair vs Gustavo Perez / Lee Stacy6-2, 6-2
2024-10-11vs Martin's MillWon 10
W#1 DoublesMario Morales / Landon Blair vs Benito Pelayo / Tom McCloy2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-11vs Sonterra SelectWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarl Bain / Landon Blair vs Michael Miller / John Mansfield6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Kristian Broaddus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.59
4.35
Christian Casillas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.31
Hector Munoz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Alejandro Tajonar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Tyler Nielsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.23
Jate Cox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Coby Heimann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Derrick Kinsey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.91
Douglas McKee
published 4
3.88
Landon Blair
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Chris Vaughn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christian Casillas + Alejandro Tajonar1447% games+13.5% vs expected
Jate Cox + Arnaud Guillemard044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristian Broaddus
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
4.71
5
Arnaud Guillemard
0W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
4.59
4.5
Christian Casillas
14W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Hector Munoz
19W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Alejandro Tajonar
25W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.28
Tyler Nielsen
16W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.28
Jate Cox
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Coby Heimann
9W–10L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.00
4
Derrick Kinsey
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Douglas McKee
25W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.91
Landon Blair
23W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Chris Vaughn
15W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.