Teams

WARD-CCC

2025 Team Singles-DLT · Women 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 2.83 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-12-07vs Haynes-Bear PenWon 30
W#1 SinglesTaylor Ward vs Holly Wells4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKelsey Spradling vs Caroline Hill6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesBrooke Cundiff vs Caroline Bond6-4, 6-3
2025-11-16vs Sledge-CCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesTaylor Ward vs Megan Wicker7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBrooke Cundiff vs Lauren Aldridge0-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKelsey Spradling vs Meredith Fletcher6-1, 6-2
2025-11-02vs Sledge-CCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesTaylor Ward vs Lauren Aldridge1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKelsey Spradling vs Meredith Fletcher6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesBritney Rocconi vs Teresa Reed1-6, 2-6
2025-10-19vs Haynes-Bear PenLost 12
L#1 SinglesMary Parker Janoush vs Jordan Langston3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDestiny Livingston vs Emily Melton1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesBrooke Cundiff vs Caroline Bond6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sledge-CCC4211718141
2Hamrick - Bear Pen429920163
3WARD-CCC249920171
4Haynes-Bear Pen2471124169

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Taylor Ward
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Destiny Livingston
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.60
Kelsey Spradling
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.52
Mary Parker Janoush
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.41
Brooke Cundiff
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.31
Britney Rocconi
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Ward + Kelsey Spradling7853% games−3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Ward
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.78
3
Destiny Livingston
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kelsey Spradling
24W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%23%77%
2.60
Mary Parker Janoush
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Brooke Cundiff
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
2.5
Britney Rocconi
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.