Teams

Lucky Duckies

2025 18 & OVER SPRING WEEKEND WOMEN · 3.0 Women Saturday

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-07vs Fair Oaks Ranch FlameWon 40
W#1 DoublesGina Rodriguez / Irma Trevino vs Ruth Pina / Sheila Cruz6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGina Jones / Karen Gauthier vs Stacey Harper / Kim Seminsky6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLily Schwegler vs CHARLOTTE GARZA6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Fredette / Ajay Carpenter vs Amanda Gallegos / Laura Ferguson6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Lily Schwegler
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.11
Gina Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Lori Castellaw
published
2.96
Stephanie DeRusse
published
2.95
Karen Gauthier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Nancy Fredette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Irma Trevino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Ajay Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Jennifer Zacho
published
Deb Schmid
published 3
2.74
Ivonne Rivera
published
2.59
Dianne Moe
published 3
2.52
Lucy Novak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irma Trevino + Gina Rodriguez11554% games−1.2% vs expected
Jennifer Zacho + Dianne Moe123 matchesnot enough data
Karen Gauthier + Gina Rodriguez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lily Schwegler
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Gina Rodriguez
24W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
Lori Castellaw
30W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Stephanie DeRusse
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
2.96
Karen Gauthier
21W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Nancy Fredette
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Irma Trevino
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Ajay Carpenter
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Jennifer Zacho
7W–20L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Deb Schmid
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ivonne Rivera
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Dianne Moe
20W–44L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Lucy Novak
4W–16L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.