Teams

Odell Degnan

2026 CSRATA USTA MXD 40 & Over - Summer '26 · Mixed 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-11vs CCRC HamiltonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDouglas Stahura / Stacey Percell vs Fain Dye / Tracy Conlon6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlyssa Degnan / Wayne Frei vs Qingdan Wu / Jonathan Harwood5-7, 4-6
2026-07-08vs CCRC CassellWon 21
W#1 DoublesWayne Frei / Angela Magnuson vs John Whitwell / Denise Vaughn6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDouglas Stahura / Stacey Percell vs Tony Kramer / Jan Johnson4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKristen Galvan / Thomas Kuntz vs Craig Adamski / Laura Adamski7-5, 7-5
2026-06-24vs CCRC HamiltonSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDouglas Stahura / Nichol Gregory vs Fain Dye / Tracy Conlon5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesWayne Frei / Alyssa Degnan vs Ross Lyons / Michelle Lyons6-3, 6-2
2026-06-17vs CCRC CassellLost 12
L#1 DoublesDana Davis / Thomas Kuntz vs David Hartmann / Dara Dixon4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStacey Percell / Chad Matthews vs Jeff Johnston / Zuzana Berrong6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKristen Galvan / Luis Galvan vs Laura Adamski / Craig Adamski0-6, 1-6
2026-06-03vs CCRC HamiltonWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlyssa Degnan / Wayne Frei vs Sterling Hamilton / Angelique Alvarado6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAngela Magnuson / Gregory Reese vs Jonathan Harwood / Qingdan Wu6-2, 6-3
2026-05-20vs CCRC CassellLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Magnuson / Thomas Kuntz vs David Hartmann / Dara Dixon4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Homan / Chad Matthews vs Christine Lewis / Jeff Johnston6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStacey Percell / Douglas Stahura vs Laura Adamski / Craig Adamski4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-06vs CCRC HamiltonLost 02
L#1 DoublesNichol Gregory / Chad Matthews vs Fain Dye / Nadine Brendza7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlyssa Degnan / Thomas Kuntz vs Bill Rogier / Qingdan Wu6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-29vs CCRC CassellLost 12
L#1 DoublesWayne Frei / Stacey Percell vs Dara Dixon / David Hartmann7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristen Galvan / Luis Galvan vs Tom Battey / Zuzana Berrong1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNichol Gregory / Gregory Reese vs Jan Johnson / Tony Kramer5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Mixed 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCRC Cassell7119515189
2Odell Degnan35101429224
3CCRC Hamilton2671736246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Angela Magnuson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Stacey Percell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.45
Nichol Gregory
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Chad Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Kristen Galvan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Wayne Frei
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.38
Brooke Homan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Thomas Kuntz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Alyssa Degnan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Douglas Stahura
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Gregory Reese
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Luis Galvan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Galvan + Nichol Gregory5159% games+6.2% vs expected
Brooke Homan + Angela Magnuson301557% games+1.1% vs expected
Brooke Homan + Nichol Gregory1445% games−4.0% vs expected
Wayne Frei + Douglas Stahura314 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Frei + Alyssa Degnan213 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Frei + Gregory Reese213 matchesnot enough data
Chad Matthews + Alyssa Degnan033 matchesnot enough data
Stacey Percell + Douglas Stahura123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Magnuson
103W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.65
Stacey Percell
44W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.46
Nichol Gregory
54W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Chad Matthews
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
3.44
Kristen Galvan
60W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Wayne Frei
26W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Brooke Homan
90W–75L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
Thomas Kuntz
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Alyssa Degnan
70W–52L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Douglas Stahura
12W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Gregory Reese
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Luis Galvan
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.