Teams

PTC-Ouellette/Hill

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Nina Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.50
Colleen Kellogg
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.35
Reiko Maeda
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Annette Hill
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Chelsea Place
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Natasha Rinard
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Michelle DeVaughn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-03-19Won 21
W#1 DoublesAnnette Hill / Colleen Kellogg vs Kimberly Stockstad / Maya Mori6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesReiko Maeda vs Ashley Hage6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNina Hanson / Dar Dragoon vs Anna Myers / Celene Robert6-4, 6-2
2022-03-13Lost 13
L#1 DoublesAmy Ouellette / Reiko Maeda vs Dana Baioni / Michelle Posey6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAnnette Hill / Michelle DeVaughn vs Julie Kim / Caroline Popma6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNatasha Rinard vs Barbara Gram6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesColleen Kellogg / Mary Priester vs Hanny Tan / Jill Eilers6-3, 6-0
2022-03-12Won 21
L#1 DoublesColleen Kellogg / Natasha Rinard vs Katrina Heiles / Lisa West6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesReiko Maeda / Nina Hanson vs RENEE VANDEGRIEND / Christina Cork6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnnette Hill / Michelle DeVaughn vs Dorothy Sherwood / Alana Rhea6-0, 6-0
2022-03-06Split 11
W#1 DoublesAnnette Hill / Colleen Kellogg vs Laura Rundle / Bin He3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesReiko Maeda / Chelsea Place vs Laura Shier / Cynthia Hill3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-05Won 30
W#2 DoublesDar Dragoon / Nina Hanson vs Angela Benedict / Heidi Kjos6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesReiko Maeda vs Elizabeth Duckworth6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAngie Gordon / Natasha Rinard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-27Won 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle DeVaughn / Colleen Kellogg vs Mary Lowblad / Judi Babcock6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnnette Hill / Nina Hanson vs Jennifer Noble / Jan Koenig7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSheryl Riley / Chelsea Place vs Kylie Kollar / Naun Yvonne Kim6-1, 6-2
2022-02-20Split 11
W#1 DoublesColleen Kellogg / Shelby Hill vs Chrys Culver / Lana Lane4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Priester / Nina Hanson vs Barbara Griffin / Gina Meyer6-0, 6-2
2022-01-07Lost 03
L#1 DoublesColleen Kellogg / Michelle DeVaughn vs Judi Babcock / Suzanne Chambers7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesReiko Maeda vs Elizabeth Cook6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDar Dragoon / Nina Hanson vs Jennifer Noble / Marilyn Sims6-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nina Hanson
110W–57L career
4%96%0%
3.69
3.5
Colleen Kellogg
65W–69L career
0%81%19%
3.50
3.5
Reiko Maeda
76W–78L career
0%98%2%
3.35
3.5
Annette Hill
62W–69L career
0%98%1%
3.30
3.5
Chelsea Place
32W–27L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Natasha Rinard
57W–51L career
3%97%0%
3.21
3
Michelle DeVaughn
14W–39L career
0%68%32%
3.02

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.