Teams

KMeyers (Park Road)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-05vs ERupert (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Moseley / Christy Haseltine vs Jane Sickles / Susan Sutherland2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesFranchone Bey vs Julie Busha3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNatalie Lombardi / Van ONeill vs Pamela Burks / Elizabeth Heald3-6, 2-6
2022-04-28vs SReynolds (Queens Complex)Split 11
L#2 SinglesAllison Moseley vs Sophie Graham2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNatalie Lombardi / Van ONeill vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-21vs PDonoghue (Matthews)Split 11
W#1 SinglesFranchone Bey vs Kristen Johnson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesVan ONeill / Christy Haseltine vs Paula Donoghue / Tracy Stamey2-6, 1-6
2022-03-31vs LUntener (Queens)Split 11
W#1 SinglesFranchone Bey vs Stacey Whitney4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatie Perry / Allison Moseley vs Laurie Untener / Rachel Sawyer3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-03-24vs MMerchant (Queens)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesFranchone Bey vs Megan Griffin2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Moseley / Van ONeill vs Coretta Wilson / Amy Winter1-6, 6-7
2022-03-10vs KHart (Blakeney)Won 10
W#1 SinglesFranchone Bey vs Rosalie ORourke3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-03vs CGoldblatt/MParker (OPRC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesWhitney Dunn / Van ONeill vs Mary Parker / Ashley Rudolph1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesFranchone Bey vs Sandra To0-6, 0-6
2022-02-24vs THolwager (Life Time)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Barnes / Allison Moseley vs Jennifer Lundberg / Brenda Sweeney3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesFranchone Bey vs Christine Pringle6-7, 4-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Katie Meyers
published
3.90
Julia Wilson
published
3.83
Natalie Lombardi
published
3.49
3.44
Franchone Bey
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.18
Allison Moseley
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.06
Mitchell Kelling
published
2.95
Van ONeill
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Meyers
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
4.03
Julia Wilson
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
Natalie Lombardi
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Christy Haseltine
5W–23L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Franchone Bey
65W–55L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Allison Moseley
52W–69L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Mitchell Kelling
3W–13L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Van ONeill
18W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.