Teams

Hills/Armagost/55&Over8.0M

2024 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-02vs HG Gang Green - E. CollinsWon 20
W#2 DoublesThor Moody / Sylvain Gauthier vs Timothy Carr / Doug Angelone6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Holland / Mark Wolfson vs Michael Bitting / John Kushner6-4, 6-4
2024-02-24vs HG Gang Green - E. CollinsWon 10
W#3 DoublesSteven Ehrenpreis / Thor Moody vs Michael Dasilva / Timothy Carr6-4, 6-3
2024-02-03vs HG Gang Green - E. CollinsWon 10
W#3 DoublesThor Moody / Stephen Mullis vs Timothy Carr / George Pierce6-0, 6-1
2024-01-27vs HG Gang Green - E. CollinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesBrad Armagost / Mark Wolfson vs Michael Dasilva / Doug Angelone6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesThor Moody / Stephen Mullis vs Eddie Collins / Gregory Morrissey0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-01-13vs HG Gang Green - E. CollinsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesThor Moody / Stephen Mullis vs Michael Dasilva / Doug Angelone6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Holland / Mark Wolfson vs Gregory Morrissey / George Pierce6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Albert Alhadeff
published 4
Brad Armagost
published 4
Chris Eversole
published 4
3.74
John Hockin
published
3.72
Thor Moody
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.69
Sylvain Gauthier
published
3.64
Todd Abrams
published
John Holland
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Wolfson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Randy Sterns
published
Stephen Mullis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Wolfson + John Holland6947% games+5.6% vs expected
Mark Wolfson + Thor Moody123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Albert Alhadeff
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Brad Armagost
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Chris Eversole
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Hockin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
Thor Moody
148W–97L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
Sylvain Gauthier
23W–18L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Todd Abrams
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
John Holland
60W–63L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Wolfson
62W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Randy Sterns
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Mullis
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.