Teams

Bilby/40s/4.0/PAC Day

2025 Man · Cov Adult 40 & Over - Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 4.12 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTara Bilby / Nicole Loeb vs Bridgette Taylor / Lori Hunter3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Fell / Nicole Loeb vs Vonda Downing / Cherie Pausina6-4, 6-1
2025-03-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesNicole Loeb / Kristie Zibilich vs April Luscy / Melissa Verges6-1, 7-5
2025-02-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesKristine Ball / Nicole Loeb vs Rhonda Eckholdt / Cherie Pausina6-4, 7-5
2025-02-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesKristine Ball / Nicole Loeb vs Rhonda Eckholdt / Cherie Pausina7-6, 6-0
2025-02-04vs Jones/40s/4.0/BC DayWon 10
W#2 DoublesTara Bilby / Nicole Loeb vs Mary Toce / Stephanie Hough6-0, 6-2
2025-02-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesKristine Ball / Nicole Loeb vs Debra Ethridge / Lynette Blossman6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Adult 40 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Catt
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.80
Amy Burdette
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.79
Vicky Martin
published
3.68
Amy Bergeron
usually #3 Doubles 68%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.64
Catherine Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 35%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 4
Julie Lemaire
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Kourtney Kentzel
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Kristie Zibilich
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Kristine Ball
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Nicole Loeb
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Stephanie Fried
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tara Bilby
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Bilby + Amy Bergeron3350% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Fried + Julie Lemaire213 matchesnot enough data
Kristie Zibilich + Amy Bergeron303 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Loeb + Kristine Ball303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Catt
9W–0L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Amy Burdette
29W–14L career · 16 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Vicky Martin
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Amy Bergeron
23W–14L career · 22 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Catherine Martinez
22W–9L career · 20 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Julie Lemaire
8W–5L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kourtney Kentzel
17W–5L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristie Zibilich
12W–3L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristine Ball
8W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Loeb
6W–1L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Fried
7W–2L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tara Bilby
14W–12L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.