Teams

Bake - LLW - Haagsma

2021 Adult 18 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 3.0 - Bake

13 players · average NTRP 3.31 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-23vs Bake - PerieraWon 10
W#3 DoublesLinette Holliday / Angela Echeverria vs Amber Forzetting / Erika Gatson6-0, 6-0
2021-04-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesLinette Holliday vs Tori Gilin6-0, 6-2
2021-04-11vs Bake - PerieraWon 10
W#2 SinglesLinette Holliday vs Lauren Eittreim6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2021-03-21Won 10
W#2 SinglesLinette Holliday vs Tori Gilin6-4, 7-6
2021-03-14vs Bake - PerieraWon 10
W#1 SinglesLinette Holliday vs Ashley Periera6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Linette Holliday
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Diane Bashirtash
published 3.5
3.21
Dianne Benshoof
published 3.5
3.18
Meghan Carnegie
published
3.15
Michelle Pisano
published
3.11
Agnes DeJong
published 3.5
3.08
Krista Rodriguez
published
2.94
Cheyenne Romanini
published 3.5
2.90
Marri Tillema
published 3
2.79
Cindy Seibly
published 3
2.78
Minda Owens
published 3
Rhonda McBride
published
Terry Echeverria
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marri Tillema + Minda Owens101253% games+7.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Linette Holliday
118W–107L career · 8 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Diane Bashirtash
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Dianne Benshoof
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Meghan Carnegie
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.18
Michelle Pisano
7W–11L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Agnes DeJong
12W–14L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
Krista Rodriguez
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Cheyenne Romanini
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Marri Tillema
49W–64L career · no lines in 2021
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Cindy Seibly
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Minda Owens
39W–55L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
2.78
Rhonda McBride
11W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Terry Echeverria
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.