Teams

Double Trouble

2021 Adult 55 and Over League · 8.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-04-10vs Love Means NothingWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Berglund / Kimber Hoang-Street vs Cynthia Funai / Joyce Colleen6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJackie DeCrinis / Abbie Murray vs Petra Dupont / Panna Cappelli6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJuliana Massenburg / Sharon Dahlquist vs Deanna DiBiase / Nani Ehlinger6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-03-28vs Fab 55'sWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanet Berglund / Barbara-Toni Langshaw vs Daphne Okamoto / Carol Lam6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Sullivan / Judy Close vs Young Shishido / Cynthia Feike2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKristine Oyama / Jackie DeCrinis vs Susan Armstrong / Maylynn Ikioka6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-03-23vs Wailea Silver SwordsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJackie DeCrinis / Abbie Murray vs Leslie Haughney / M Beverly Rivers6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJanet Berglund / Kimber Hoang-Street vs Rachel Christopher / Barbara Botkin6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMargaret Simpson / Karen Sullivan vs Diane Chaves / Bonnie Gray6-0, 6-4
2021-03-20vs Love Means NothingLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Sullivan / Margaret Simpson vs Nani Ehlinger / Edna Abe6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanet Berglund / Kimber Hoang-Street vs Mona Decrinis / Panna Cappelli4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara-Toni Langshaw / Kristine Oyama vs Jill Kanahele / Debra Lordan7-6, 6-3
2021-03-07vs Fab 55'sLost 03
L#1 DoublesJuliana Massenburg / Sharon Dahlquist vs Cynthia Feike / Young Shishido1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichele McLean / Judy Close vs Debbie Montgomery / Deborah Sawyer3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara-Toni Langshaw / Abbie Murray vs Anne Burch / Maylynn Ikioka3-6, 4-6
2021-02-28vs Wailea Silver SwordsLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichele McLean / Judy Close vs Rachel Christopher / Barbara Botkin2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKimber Hoang-Street / Jeanne Dunn vs Rita Ingstad / Janet King1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJackie DeCrinis / Kristine Oyama vs Caroline Gammie / Tamara Farwig5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Kimber Hoang-Street
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.92
Karen Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Jackie DeCrinis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Judy Close
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.61
Kristine Oyama
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.60
Jeanne Dunn
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.59
Juliana Massenburg
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.50
Abbie Murray
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Sharon Dahlquist
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Janet Berglund
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michele McLean
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Sullivan + Kimber Hoang-Street4259% games+6.6% vs expected
Jeanne Dunn + Juliana Massenburg1640% games+0.8% vs expected
Jeanne Dunn + Janet Berglund3352% games−0.2% vs expected
Jeanne Dunn + Sharon Dahlquist4446% games−11.1% vs expected
Sharon Dahlquist + Juliana Massenburg1440% gamesnot enough data
Abbie Murray + Jackie DeCrinis404 matchesnot enough data
Abbie Murray + Sharon Dahlquist224 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Dunn + Kristine Oyama044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimber Hoang-Street
40W–21L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.96
Karen Sullivan
37W–33L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Jackie DeCrinis
55W–33L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Judy Close
63W–39L career · 7 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Kristine Oyama
47W–47L career · 6 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
Jeanne Dunn
46W–77L career · 5 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
Juliana Massenburg
37W–35L career · 5 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
3.59
3.5
Abbie Murray
38W–37L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Sharon Dahlquist
27W–35L career · 2 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.07
Janet Berglund
30W–29L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michele McLean
23W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.