Teams

KChapman (Piper Glen)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men - Thurs PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-18vs CCrews (Hornets Nest)Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Sercer / Bobby Dhillon vs John Monteith / Joey Heft6-0, 6-0
2023-05-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesPaul Sercer / Scott Harman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-20vs EOvendorf/BGibson (WSRC)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesPaul Sercer vs MAGESH ARUMUGAM4-6, 1-6
2023-04-13vs MReishman (OPRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Sercer / Scott Harman vs Joe O'Connor / Glenn Brunker6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-30vs JSchoore (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesPaul Sercer vs Danny Vazquez4-6, 4-6
2023-03-16vs ZGilbert (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKristoff Goson / Joseph Garner vs Mac Schweppe / Sean OLeary1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesPaul Sercer vs Antonio Farrington6-3, 6-0
2023-03-09vs DPowell (PPRSC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBobby Dhillon / Joseph Garner vs John Scovanner / Charles Lehman7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKevin Smith / Paul Sercer vs Keith Wheatley / David Moore6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-06Won 20
W#2 DoublesJoseph Garner / Kris Chapman vs Tommy Scott / Thomas Bentley6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesPaul Sercer vs Michael Primavera6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Paul Sercer
usually #2 Singles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Kenneth Dorado
published
3.07
Nicholas Munn
published
2.95
Joseph Garner
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.92
Kristoff Goson
published
2.88
Kenneth Godfrey
published
2.75
Kris Chapman
published
2.71
Jason Colgate
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Godfrey + Joseph Garner5257% games+10.1% vs expected
Paul Sercer + Joseph Garner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Paul Sercer
38W–29L career · 12 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Kenneth Dorado
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Nicholas Munn
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Joseph Garner
48W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.95
Kristoff Goson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92
Kenneth Godfrey
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Kris Chapman
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
William John McGough Jr.
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Jason Colgate
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.