Teams

PD18/Askins/HCC

2026 STA Adult Combo 18 & Over - PD · Adult Women - 6.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 17 7:00 PM
Florence Country Club
Sep 24 7:00 PM
Hartsville Country Club
2026-09-03vs PD18/Wightman/EBEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJane Ponder / Rachel Ingram vs Regie Genete / Ophillia Dominique6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMarian Bunnell / Kathy Brown vs Marlene Ward / Kelli McGregor6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTatum Warr / Terrie Reames vs Helen Carroll / Ronelle van Heerden0-6, 3-6
2026-08-20vs PD18/Lee/FTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Ingram / Rashmi Anki vs Tamera King / Lorraine Tindal3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJenny Rogers / Rebecca Ivie vs Taylor Wiley / Beth Dynan2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTatum Warr / Terrie Reames vs Robin Downing / Rocio Perez6-3, 6-1
2026-08-13vs PD18/NANCE/FCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Brown / Rashmi Anki vs Ning Wharton / Pat Pitiranggon2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Ivie / Barbara Lee vs Caitlin Kocherla / Laura Buen Abad6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTerrie Reames / Nimita Ankireddypalli vs Beth Gunter / Haixia Xi3-6, 3-6
2026-07-30vs PD18/Wightman/EBELost 12
L#1 DoublesAllyne Askins / Barbara Lee vs Haley Wightman / Kameron Storr0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMarian Bunnell / Rashmi Anki vs Helen Carroll / Marlene Ward6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDusty Braddock / Nimita Ankireddypalli vs Melissa Boyer / Candace Stuckey1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Marian Bunnell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Rachel Ingram
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Jane Ponder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Tatum Warr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Margaret Beasley
published
2.73
Allyne Askins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Terrie Reames
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Jenny Rogers
published
2.64
Rebecca Ivie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Dusty Braddock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Rashmi Anki
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Barbara Lee
published 3
2.46
Anita Crawford
published 3
Nimita Ankireddypalli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Crawford + Jane Ponder134 matchesnot enough data
Allyne Askins + Dusty Braddock123 matchesnot enough data
Marian Bunnell + Margaret Beasley033 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Ingram + Rebecca Ivie123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marian Bunnell
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
Rachel Ingram
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.90
Jane Ponder
16W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
Tatum Warr
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Margaret Beasley
9W–11L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Allyne Askins
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Terrie Reames
13W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
2.69
Jenny Rogers
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
Rebecca Ivie
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Dusty Braddock
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
Rashmi Anki
44W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Barbara Lee
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Anita Crawford
10W–27L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.46
Nimita Ankireddypalli
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.