Teams

QRRC-Heinz

2022 OH OV WINTER A18&O · 2022 Winter A18&O 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.30 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-14vs STC-SayerLost 13
L#1 DoublesDana Butler / Mark Montgomery vs Kevin Fraker / Tim Sayer1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Nabholz vs Akinobu Masunaga6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRandy Palmer / Eric McHenry vs Brandon Collins / Christopher Hegyi0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMatthew Hobbs vs Mike Traylor2-6, 5-7
2022-04-30vs FSSC-MitchellSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMark Montgomery / Dana Butler vs Mark Alfes / Sam Dowse6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Nabholz vs Joshua Raker6-1, 6-2
2022-04-16vs WPAFB-HonoreLost 04
L#1 DoublesDana Butler / Mark Montgomery vs Tony Brown / Joseph Graham2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDave Baldetti vs Derrick Slatton2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEric McHenry / Tom Noonan vs Claudio Bellini / Thomas Bernhardt3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Hobbs vs Nicholas Montano2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-03-27vs QRRC-WenzLost 03
L#1 DoublesRandy Palmer / Eric McHenry vs Steve Henrich / Joel Somerset0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Malas vs Tyler Urse2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrad Kreusch / Matthew Hobbs vs George Thielen / Mark Burns1-6, 0-6
2022-03-05vs SRTC-AllenSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDana Butler / Dave Baldetti vs Michael Bonilla / Elias Toubia7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Nabholz vs Mel Brown6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJohn Malas vs Timothy Lofton3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRandy Palmer / Brandon Raney vs Will Allen / Michael Lee4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-02-19vs KTC-PickrelLost 04
L#1 DoublesDana Butler / Mark Montgomery vs John Daley / Miguel Layrisse0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRandy Palmer / Eric McHenry vs Richard Pickrel / Duncan Dversdall0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Malas vs Patrick Gill4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlexander Ostrum / Brandon Raney vs Douglas Noe / Darren Taylor1-6, 4-6
2022-02-13vs STC-RitzeLost 03
L#1 DoublesRandy Palmer / Mark Montgomery vs Jeffrey Levine / Phillip Pierri3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDave Baldetti vs Mike Ritze3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrandon Raney / Eric McHenry vs Jim Hogue / Daryl Parks2-6, 3-6
2022-02-05vs QRRC-MadofforiLost 04
L#1 DoublesRandy Palmer / Mark Montgomery vs Michael Zink / Edward McCall0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Nabholz vs Adam Beiersdorfer6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrandon Raney / Tom Noonan vs Christopher Bennington / Roy Stevens2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Malas vs Chris Voudris1-6, 4-6
2022-01-22vs KTC-ButteryLost 02
L#1 DoublesDana Butler / Randy Palmer vs Taylor Murphy / Ariz Anklesaria3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Nabholz vs Arzan Varachhawala6-1, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 Winter A18&O 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Jeffrey Nabholz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Dana Butler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dave Baldetti
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
JP Heinz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Matthew Hobbs
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Eric McHenry
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Brandon Raney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
Alexander Ostrum
published
John Malas
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Mark Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Randy Palmer
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Tom Noonan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Montgomery + Dana Butler0631% gamesnot enough data
Randy Palmer + Mark Montgomery033 matchesnot enough data
Randy Palmer + Eric McHenry033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Nabholz
45W–45L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Dana Butler
13W–31L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dave Baldetti
13W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
JP Heinz
9W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Hobbs
11W–41L career · 8 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
3
Eric McHenry
37W–45L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Brandon Raney
10W–17L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Alexander Ostrum
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Malas
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Montgomery
4W–47L career · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data
Randy Palmer
3W–21L career · 13 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Noonan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.