Teams

PC-Smash Brothers 2025

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 MEN

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-16vs YTC - StephenWon 32
L#1 DoublesPeter Rysavy / Srinivasa Repalle vs Scott Stephen / Raymond Rust Jr5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesCody Davey vs Karl Lieberknecht6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesArjun Shanker / Roman Gavino vs Robert Bjur / Aaron Matthias1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWOONGJO Choi vs Quinn Plant4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHardik Panchal / Kyle Chan vs Allan Yeung / Dan Stephens4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-15vs EW-PC-WestLost 14
L#1 DoublesArjun Shanker / Trevor Morrison vs Jeremey White / Bryce Richardson6-4, 3-5
W#1 SinglesWOONGJO Choi vs Mike Robertson6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRevell Coy / Peter Rysavy vs Don Donais / Austen Hebdon3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesKyle Chan vs Owen Hartliep6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCraig Hansen / Kyle Weyand vs Eric Missett / Anthony Smith6-7, 3-6
2025-03-15vs YTC - StephenWon 32
W#1 DoublesArjun Shanker / Trevor Morrison vs Karl Lieberknecht / Danny Sanchez6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesVirupaksha Repalle vs Scott Stephen5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPeter Rysavy / Revell Coy vs Robert Bjur / Aaron Matthias6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCody Davey vs Raymond Rust Jr4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRoman Gavino / Hardik Panchal vs Chris Cantrell / Quinn Plant6-4, 6-4
2025-03-14vs EW-PC-WestLost 14
W#1 DoublesTrevor Morrison / Arjun Shanker vs Bryan Robison / Anthony Smith7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWOONGJO Choi vs Austen Hebdon0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCraig Hansen / Kyle Weyand vs Don Donais / Jeremey White6-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesVirupaksha Repalle vs Owen Hartliep1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCody Davey / Roman Gavino vs Jay West / Bryce Richardson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-West3113718180
2PC-Smash Brothers 20252281228202
3YTC - Stephen1391124188

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Revell Coy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Arjun Shanker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Peter Rysavy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Hardik Panchal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Daniel Li
published 3.5
3.23
Roman Gavino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Cody Davey
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
WOONGJO Choi
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.14
Sean Holloway
published 3.5
3.13
Craig Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Srinivasa Repalle
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kyle Chan
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kyle Weyand
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Trevor Morrison
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Virupaksha Repalle
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roman Gavino + Hardik Panchal12851% games+1.5% vs expected
Roman Gavino + Sean Holloway2640% games+1.5% vs expected
Craig Hansen + Roman Gavino4944% games−1.6% vs expected
Revell Coy + Peter Rysavy044 matchesnot enough data
Trevor Morrison + Arjun Shanker314 matchesnot enough data
Hardik Panchal + Sean Holloway224 matchesnot enough data
Revell Coy + Sean Holloway303 matchesnot enough data
Srinivasa Repalle + Peter Rysavy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Revell Coy
21W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.44
3.5
Arjun Shanker
23W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Peter Rysavy
7W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Hardik Panchal
31W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Daniel Li
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Roman Gavino
80W–81L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cody Davey
2W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
WOONGJO Choi
22W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Sean Holloway
45W–46L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Craig Hansen
28W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Srinivasa Repalle
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
Kyle Chan
1W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kyle Weyand
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trevor Morrison
35W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Virupaksha Repalle
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.