Teams

Edwardson 7.0 18+ MX S23

2023 MIXED 18 & OVER SUMMER · 7.0 MIXED

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-06-25vs Bartz 7.0 18+ Mixed UpWon 10
W#3 DoublesWhitney Nyholm / Daniel Edwardson vs Rachel Lund / Cisco Labayki6-3, 7-6
2023-06-04vs Hagen/Gilchrist- WBL 7.0 18+MX S23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDaniel Edwardson / Kyla Bills vs Christine Leach / Chris McAlpine4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel Edwardson / Kyla Bills vs Jeffrey Nelson / Paula Bach6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MIXED have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Phillip Chase
published 4.5
3.94
Jason Thiner
published
3.77
Whitney Nyholm
published 4
3.67
Steven Swanberg
published
3.66
Sara Hong
published
3.39
Daniel Edwardson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Kathryn Schneider
published
3.13
Andrea Thiner
published 3.5
3.01
Timothy Cruz
published
Lauren Smith-Kiewel
published
Nik Larsen
published
Noah Joseph
published
Sarah van Camp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Thiner + Andrea Thiner51345% games−3.0% vs expected
Whitney Nyholm + Phillip Chase11459% games−7.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Phillip Chase
112W–51L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
Jason Thiner
90W–87L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
3.94
4
Whitney Nyholm
41W–25L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Steven Swanberg
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
Sara Hong
33W–24L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Daniel Edwardson
99W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kathryn Schneider
21W–24L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Andrea Thiner
38W–57L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Timothy Cruz
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
Lauren Smith-Kiewel
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nik Larsen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Noah Joseph
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah van Camp
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.