PT&E/SJRC-Simons

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.23 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36

Peter Farrelly

usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5

3.31

DANIEL WOYTEK

usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3

3.28

Zachary Horn

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.23

Saul Hernandez Meza

usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5

3.20

Evan Simons

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5

3.19

Rob Laing

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.18

Mario Sanchez

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3

3.15

Steve DeKlotz

usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3

3.08

David Floyd

usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3

3.07

Ralf Bednarz

usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3

2.97

Thomas Croll

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5

Peter Farrelly

42W–55L career

0%96%4%

3.36

DANIEL WOYTEK

13W–8L career

0%9%91%

3.31

3.5

Zachary Horn

4W–5L career · type S

2%97%2%

3.28

3.5

Saul Hernandez Meza

23W–20L career

2%98%0%

3.23

3.5

Evan Simons

35W–19L career

3%97%0%

3.20

3.5

Rob Laing

29W–53L career

4%96%0%

3.19

Mario Sanchez

26W–19L career

0%31%69%

3.18

Steve DeKlotz

42W–10L career

0%37%63%

3.15

David Floyd

56W–37L career · type A

0%59%41%

3.08

Ralf Bednarz

69W–43L career

0%63%37%

3.07

Thomas Croll

30W–28L career

0%85%15%

2.97

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.