Teams

Ash-Matchy Matchy

2022 One Doubles · 2.5 Women

1 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Nicola Ash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results9 ties
2022-08-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Amelia Hooker vs Amy Kaplan / Carli Weckerly6-4, 6-0
2022-08-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Amelia Hooker vs Sharon Wise / Crystal Ounaphom4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-08-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Amelia Hooker vs Emily Shue / Anita Heredia6-0, 6-2
2022-08-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Amelia Hooker vs Erin Herrick / Julie Kafoury6-2, 6-0
2022-08-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Amelia Hooker vs Misug Kim / Penny Luong6-2, 7-5
2022-07-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Amelia Hooker vs Becky Coder / Monet Hammond6-0, 6-2
2022-06-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Amelia Hooker vs Sheila Amarga-Lee / Janice Hazel6-2, 6-4
2022-06-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Amelia Hooker vs Anne Mangan / Milenka Coltman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-06-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicola Ash / Amelia Hooker vs KC Bildner / Roxanna Johnson1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Nicola Ash
114W–136L career
1%99%0%
2.74

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.