ROHNERT PK TC/MAGNOLIA/M PK 40MX9.0A

2026 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX9.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.27 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule9 played

2026-08-16vs RAFAEL RC 40MX9.0ASplit 1–1

L#1 DoublesTom Veach / Alexis Webb vs Emily Parento / Henry Hagenbuch4-6, 6-4, 0-1

W#2 DoublesCory Fulchiron / Liz Hartmann vs Nick Notti / Elizabeth Notti6-3, 6-1

2026-08-09vs HARBOR PT 40MX9.0ALost 0–2

L#1 DoublesLiz Hartmann / Tom Veach vs Augusto Acosta / Valeria Pinna2-6, 6-2, 0-1

L#3 DoublesJane Liddle / Daniel Tyreus vs Michael Viani / Marie van Elder3-6, 2-6

2026-08-02vs RAFAEL RC 40MX9.0ASplit 1–1

W#1 DoublesTom Veach / Liz Hartmann vs Angela Downs / Mike Downs6-0, 6-3

L#3 DoublesDaniel Tyreus / Jane Liddle vs Jennifer Slippy / Tommy Hellyer6-3, 3-6, 0-1

2026-08-01vs RAFAEL RC 40MX9.0ALost 0–1

L#1 DoublesJocelyn Werner / Tom Veach vs Leigh Pagan / Dan Oppenheim4-6, 7-6, 0-1

2026-07-26vs HARBOR PT 40MX9.0ALost 0–1

L#1 DoublesLiz Hartmann / Timothy Barlow vs Valeria Pinna / Olivier Picault3-6, 5-7

2026-07-12Won 1–0

W#1 DoublesTimothy Barlow / Liz Hartmann vs Michelle Kohm / Favio de Marco6-0, 7-6

2026-07-05vs HARBOR PT 40MX9.0AWon 2–0

W#1 DoublesAlexis Webb / Tom Veach vs Augusto Acosta / Heather Ham6-4, 7-5

W#2 DoublesLiz Hartmann / Cory Fulchiron vs Annika Viragh / Olivier Picault6-2, 6-3

2026-06-20vs MARIN TC 40MX9.0ASplit 1–1

L#2 DoublesJane Liddle / Timothy Barlow vs Kimberly Borah-Schulist / Christopher Brawer6-1, 4-6, 0-1

W#3 DoublesLiz Hartmann / Angelo Purugganan vs Amy See / Favio de Marco6-4

2026-06-14vs RAFAEL RC 40MX9.0ALost 0–1

L#2 DoublesCory Fulchiron / Liz Hartmann vs Emily Parento / Henry Hagenbuch6-7, 4-6

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings22 teams · 40&Over MX9.0

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1CUESTA TC 40MX9.0A	7	2	19	8	22	225
2SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC 40MX9.0A	7	2	18	9	23	223
3JOHNSON RANCH 40MX9.0A	7	2	18	9	24	246
4WASHOE TENNIS CLUB/WASHOE TC 40MX9.0A	6	3	18	9	22	212
5MARIN TC 40MX9.0A	6	3	16	11	24	205
6MEMORIAL-ALBANY 40MX9.0A	6	3	15	12	26	244
7BAY CLUB PL 40MX9.0A	6	3	16	11	29	246
8RAFAEL RC 40MX9.0A	6	3	15	12	31	247
9GOLD RIVER RC 40MX9.0B	5	3	15	9	21	196
10BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40MX9.0A	5	3	14	10	23	210
11LOS GATOS SR 40MX9.0A	5	4	13	14	31	259
12ST MARY 40MX9.0A	4	5	14	13	29	245
13ALMADEN SR 40MX9.0A	4	6	15	15	33	267
14HARBOR PT 40MX9.0A	4	6	12	18	41	293
15WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40MX9.0A	3	5	10	14	33	264
16PLEASANTON 40MX9.0A	3	6	11	16	34	259
17CUESTA TC 40MX9.0B	3	6	10	17	39	284
18TAHOE DONNER 40MX9.0A	3	6	9	18	40	280
19BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40MX9.0A	3	7	11	19	39	285
20ROHNERT PK TC/MAGNOLIA/M PK 40MX9.0A	2	6	11	13	28	212
21UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 40MX9.0A	2	6	8	16	36	260
22GOLD RIVER RC 40MX9.0A	1	8	6	21	45	291

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48

Jake Lam

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

4.44

Alexis Webb

usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5

4.34

Cory Fulchiron

usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5

4.31

Daniel Tyreus

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

4.26

Timothy Barlow

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

4.25

Jocelyn Werner

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

4.22

Tom Veach

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published —

4.10

Jane Liddle

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

4.07

Christine Mooney

usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5

4.05

Angelo Purugganan

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

4.05

Brett Wilmes

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4

3.98

Jamin Ruark

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4

3.90

Ariadile Goes Mariano

usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.87

Liz Hartmann

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published —

3.85

Blain Wong

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4

3.70

Howard Schnirman

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cory Fulchiron + Liz Hartmann	2–1	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5

Jake Lam

22W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026

<1%55%44%

4.48

4.5

Alexis Webb

15W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026

<1%67%33%

4.44

4.5

Cory Fulchiron

11W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026

<1%89%10%

4.34

4.5

Daniel Tyreus

6W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026

1%92%8%

4.31

—

Timothy Barlow

17W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026

2%95%3%

4.26

—

Jocelyn Werner

12W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026

3%95%3%

4.25

—

Tom Veach

9W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026

4%94%2%

4.22

—

Jane Liddle

15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026

23%77%<1%

4.10

4.5

Christine Mooney

7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026

29%71%<1%

4.07

4.5

Angelo Purugganan

5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026

34%66%<1%

4.05

Brett Wilmes

24W–3L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026

<1%35%65%

4.05

Jamin Ruark

21W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026

<1%55%45%

3.98

Ariadile Goes Mariano

15W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026

<1%77%23%

3.90

—

Liz Hartmann

12W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026

83%17%<1%

3.87

Blain Wong

14W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026

<1%88%12%

3.85

Howard Schnirman

7W–25L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026

6%93%1%

3.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.