Teams

Bahorski (Forestmeadows)

2023 Leon Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-30vs Kjellerup (Forestmeadows)Split 11
W#1 SinglesJennifer Winegardner vs Melissa Jaacks6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPia Lehtonen / Jennifer Larson vs Gina Herring / Melissa Johnson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-04-29vs Leon/Warner/40&Over4.0WLost 02
L#1 SinglesKathy Beggs vs Jennifer Britt2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPia Lehtonen / Jennifer Winegardner vs Elizabeth Bussey / Maria Yealdhall3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-04-06vs Leon/Warner/40&Over4.0WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathy Beggs / Susan Henderson vs Mary Warner / Amy Otis6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Winegardner / Jennifer Larson vs Lisa Graganella / Lisa Franson3-6, 5-7
2023-03-06vs Kjellerup (Forestmeadows)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathy Beggs / Cyndi Andrews vs Elaine Rudd / Sherry Cady7-6, 6-4
2023-02-20vs Leon/Warner/40&Over4.0WLost 03
L#1 SinglesJennifer Winegardner vs Jennifer Britt5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCyndi Andrews / Kathy Beggs vs Amy Otis / Lisa Franson1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPia Lehtonen / Jennifer Larson vs Kara Reister / Anna Jones4-6, 1-6
2023-02-13vs Kjellerup (Forestmeadows)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKathy Beggs / Jennifer Larson vs Melissa Johnson / Lori Elliott4-6, 3-6
2023-02-08vs Leon/Warner/40&Over4.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesPia Lehtonen / Jennifer Winegardner vs Lisa Graganella / Anna Jones4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCyndi Andrews / Jennifer Larson vs Michelle Eubanks / Stacy Chick5-7, 1-6
2023-02-06vs Kjellerup (Forestmeadows)Split 11
W#1 SinglesJennifer Winegardner vs Melissa Jaacks6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Beggs / Susan Carey vs Kim Thriffiley / Elaine Rudd3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Elizabeth Murray
published
3.71
Kathy Beggs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Pia Lehtonen
published
3.52
Jennifer Winegardner
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.44
Jennifer Larson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Beggs + Jennifer Larson7750% games+5.1% vs expected
Jennifer Larson + Jennifer Winegardner2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Murray
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Kathy Beggs
55W–60L career · 6 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Pia Lehtonen
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Jennifer Winegardner
195W–211L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Jennifer Larson
81W–99L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
3.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.