Teams

NB-Oncavage (40s 3.5M SP)

2026 Neuse River Adult 40 & Over League · 3.5 Men 40 & over

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-02vs GR-Taylor (40s 3.5M SP)Won 21
W#1 DoublesBrent Zimmer / Chris Oncavage vs Jonathan Wuntke / Gregory Johnson6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesAndy Wilkinson vs Jeff Gravelin1-0
L#2 DoublesSteffen Jaugstetter / Daniel Soreff vs Carl Seymour / Ken Drake2-6, 6-7
2026-04-28vs BW-Moore (40s 3.5M SP)Won 31
L#1 DoublesKyle Dickerson / H Curtis Mostellar vs Andy Varnell / Danny Davis2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesChris Oncavage vs Jay Wilkins6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrent Zimmer / Andy Wilkinson vs Mike Mancuso / Carlos Geigel6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAllen Elmore / Daniel Soreff vs Daniel Moore / Yuriy Kermoshchuk6-0, 0-6, 1-0
2026-04-22vs GR-Taylor (40s 3.5M SP)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKyle Dickerson / H Curtis Mostellar vs Alberto Gonzales / Matthew Casteen1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrent Zimmer vs Gregory Johnson0-1
L#2 DoublesAndy Wilkinson / Daniel Soreff vs Jonathan Wuntke / Jeff Gravelin3-6, 3-6
2026-04-11vs BW-Moore (40s 3.5M SP)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKyle Dickerson / H Curtis Mostellar vs Andy Varnell / James Caviness5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChris Oncavage vs Yuriy Kermoshchuk4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAndy Wilkinson / Brent Zimmer vs David Forehand / Mike Mancuso6-3, 7-5
2026-03-28vs GR-Taylor (40s 3.5M SP)Split 11
W#1 DoublesAllen Elmore / H Curtis Mostellar vs Brandon Sutton / Jeremiah Montgomery6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndy Wilkinson / Daniel Soreff vs Jonathan Wuntke / Jeff Gravelin1-6, 1-6
2026-03-21vs BW-Moore (40s 3.5M SP)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKyle Dickerson / Andy Wilkinson vs James Caviness / Andy Varnell7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChris Oncavage vs Yuriy Kermoshchuk4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Soreff / Allen Elmore vs Andy Monshaw / Daniel Moore6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-17vs GR-Taylor (40s 3.5M SP)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesBrent Zimmer / Andy Wilkinson vs Jeff Gravelin / Brock Felton2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesChris Oncavage vs Jeremiah Montgomery5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKyle Dickerson / Steffen Jaugstetter vs Terry Yarborough / Doug Hale6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAllen Elmore / Scott Leaver vs Jimmy Hare / Gregory Johnson5-7, 2-6
2026-03-14vs BW-Moore (40s 3.5M SP)Lost 04
L#1 DoublesKyle Dickerson / Andy Wilkinson vs James Caviness / Jay Surles6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChris Oncavage vs Yuriy Kermoshchuk6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Soreff / Scott Leaver vs Carlos Geigel / Andy Monshaw2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCraig Holton / BRYAN FARQUHAR vs David Forehand / C L Herring0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Men 40 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GR-Taylor (40s 3.5M SP)7124820214
2BW-Moore (40s 3.5M SP)44151737281
3NB-Oncavage (40s 3.5M SP)1782450335

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Brent Zimmer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Allen Elmore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Chris Oncavage
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
BRYAN FARQUHAR
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Andy Wilkinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.16
Daniel Soreff
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.15
Kyle Dickerson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.14
H Curtis Mostellar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Craig Holton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Scott Leaver
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Steffen Jaugstetter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Oncavage + Kyle Dickerson4158% games+16.0% vs expected
Brent Zimmer + Andy Wilkinson6254% games+5.1% vs expected
Steffen Jaugstetter + Daniel Soreff123 matchesnot enough data
H Curtis Mostellar + Kyle Dickerson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brent Zimmer
23W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Allen Elmore
9W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Chris Oncavage
6W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
BRYAN FARQUHAR
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Andy Wilkinson
11W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Daniel Soreff
5W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Kyle Dickerson
5W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
H Curtis Mostellar
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Craig Holton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Scott Leaver
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steffen Jaugstetter
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.