Teams

WI Tri Delta M Summer Singles MALT Hoeth

2024 WI Other · WI Tri Delta Summer Singles Men

4 players · average NTRP / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Flight standings6 teams · WI Tri Delta Summer Singles Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Tri Delta M Summer Singles MALT Nicholas912649176
2WI Tri Delta M Summer Singles MALT Sager64171327220
3WI Tri Delta M Summer Singles MALT Smith64171327229
4WI Tri Delta M Summer Singles MALT Isensee55131735256
5WI Tri Delta M Summer Singles MALT Halsted28102043286
6WI Tri Delta M Summer Singles MALT Hoeth2872349310

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Fred Idesis
published
3.12
Patrick Hoeth
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
Krishna Suraesh
usually #2 Singles 55%, also #1 Singles 36% · published
Tim Connor
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Fred Idesis
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Patrick Hoeth
24W–35L career · 13 lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
3.12
Krishna Suraesh
7W–4L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Connor
3W–25L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.