Teams

WC SD 5.0 Plus Peninsula TC/ Chiu

2024 SoCal Fall Doubles SD WE · SD

9 players · average NTRP 4.88 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-17vs SD LLW 5.0 Plus Barnes/ HoughWon 21
W#1 DoublesRyan Hahn / Steven Chen vs Gregory de Andrade / Charles Hough6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMarek Michulka vs Patrick Lipscomb6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Chiu / Nik Speshilov vs Elias Scandalis / Nicholas Schnobel6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-11-02vs SD 5.0 Plus Peninsula/ TC LinkWon 20
W#1 DoublesWilliam Chiu / David Geisinger vs Joonghoon Auh / Darrin Nguyen6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRyan Hahn vs R Kyle Thompson6-0, 6-1
2024-10-27vs SD LLW 5.0 Plus Barnes/ HoughWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarek Michulka / Steven Chen vs Jochem Hoefnagels / Aidan McNulty5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEric Tseng vs Patrick Lipscomb4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlex Angus / Ryan Hahn vs Evan Dankiewicz / Nicholas Schnobel5-2
2024-10-25vs SD 5.0 Plus Peninsula/ TC LinkWon 30
W#1 DoublesRyan Hahn / Nik Speshilov vs Chris Link / Joseph Barbarie6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesWilliam Chiu vs R Kyle Thompson6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEric Tseng / Daniel Wright vs Scott Crabtree / Joonghoon Auh6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-10-06vs SD LLW 5.0 Plus Barnes/ HoughLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlex Angus / Nik Speshilov vs KASHYAP ASHOK / Gregory de Andrade6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesWilliam Chiu vs Patrick Lipscomb6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Wright / David Geisinger vs Jochem Hoefnagels / Charles Hough1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.55 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alex Angus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
Daniel Wright
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.55
Daniel Choy
published 5
David Geisinger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Eric Tseng
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marek Michulka
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Nik Speshilov
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ryan Hahn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
William Chiu
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alex Angus
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Daniel Wright
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Daniel Choy
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.55
4.5
David Geisinger
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Eric Tseng
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marek Michulka
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nik Speshilov
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ryan Hahn
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
William Chiu
21W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.