Teams

CC of Roswell (LeAnn Kurey)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 3.5 Women (Elena Cosper)

18 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women (Elena Cosper) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Donna Hodges
published
3.29
Sherrie Board
published
3.19
Marci Silverman
published
3.19
Fran Conlan
published
3.17
Katie Markham
published
3.15
Amy Mangurian
published 3.5
3.13
Sandra Cryer
published
3.08
LeAnn Kurey
published
3.06
Donna Houghton
published
3.02
Nicole Hudson
published
2.92
Gloria Nobles
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Annette Adams
published 3
2.91
Jennifer Knapp
published
2.88
Tricia Lazo
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.67
Keri Morel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joanna Curran
published
Robin Kalick
published
Sally Phillips
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Lazo + Gloria Nobles5157% games+3.1% vs expected
Sherrie Board + Katie Markham8454% games+1.6% vs expected
Sherrie Board + LeAnn Kurey5648% games+1.0% vs expected
LeAnn Kurey + Amy Mangurian61644% games−0.5% vs expected
Tricia Lazo + Jennifer Knapp4251% games−4.1% vs expected
Nicole Hudson + Annette Adams2842% games−8.4% vs expected
Katie Markham + Gloria Nobles6072% gamesnot enough data
Sally Phillips + Sherrie Board4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donna Hodges
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
Sherrie Board
38W–34L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Marci Silverman
17W–16L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Fran Conlan
42W–28L career · no lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.19
Katie Markham
40W–20L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Amy Mangurian
22W–41L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Sandra Cryer
22W–34L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
LeAnn Kurey
24W–47L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
Donna Houghton
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.06
Nicole Hudson
18W–43L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
Gloria Nobles
33W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Annette Adams
11W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
2.91
Jennifer Knapp
36W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Tricia Lazo
38W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.88
Keri Morel
30W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.67
Joanna Curran
32W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robin Kalick
2W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sally Phillips
28W–32L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.