Teams

JByrd-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Men Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-30vs BKing-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesAndrew Hedgpeth vs Adrian Bruno6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesStacy Bowden vs David Jackson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesBarry Gitarts vs Adam Williamson2-6, 1-6
2026-06-23vs RMcGarrah-HRLost 12
L#1 SinglesBlake Jensen vs Caleb Kent0-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesAndrew Hedgpeth vs Brian Reo6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesBarry Gitarts vs Rob McGarrah1-6, 3-6
2026-06-16vs GHigh-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesAndrew Hedgpeth vs James Lambert6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBarry Gitarts vs Ryan Phillips6-2, 6-3
2026-06-09vs RSamulski-CHTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesAndrew Hedgpeth vs Charles McMillan6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBarry Gitarts vs Grant Richter6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesStacy Bowden vs Tommy Rose6-2, 6-0
2026-06-02vs CYang-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesKaushik Vemulapalli vs Yinhao Ren1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesBarry Gitarts vs Chang Yang6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesBlake Jensen vs Letian Jiang4-6, 6-7
2026-05-19vs CLynch-DURSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKaushik Vemulapalli vs Tom Luben6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesBarry Gitarts vs David Bautz6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-12vs SBurger-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesAndrew Hedgpeth vs Steven Burger6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesBarry Gitarts vs Stanislav Kukhniy6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesKaushik Vemulapalli vs Surya Sampath6-1, 6-2
2026-05-05vs CGilley-CHCCWon 30
W#1 SinglesBlake Jensen vs Carlos Quintero6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAndrew Hedgpeth vs Corey Hansen7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesStacy Bowden vs Lucas Beal6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Jermaine Byrd
published 4.5
3.30
Kevin Williams
published
3.23
Stacy Bowden
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.17
Andrew Hedgpeth
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
3.00
Kaushik Vemulapalli
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.95
Sagar Mistry
published
2.88
Blake Jensen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.77
Barry Gitarts
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 43% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
4.04
Kevin Williams
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.30
Stacy Bowden
15W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.23
3
Andrew Hedgpeth
64W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
3
Kaushik Vemulapalli
48W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Sagar Mistry
4W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Blake Jensen
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Barry Gitarts
30W–54L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.