Teams

Ruggiero

2023 Tri Level Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.79 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-02-05vs GongLost 02
L#2 DoublesKathleen Banks / Kathi Black vs Pam Santorelli / Pamela Finley6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCathy English / Holly Powell vs Kathy Benzinger / Karen Perna5-7, 2-6
2023-01-29vs Dare DoublesLost 12
L#1 DoublesMolly Connerton / Kathleen Banks vs Shuman Hua / Meagan Doxtad2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJennifer Ruggiero / Diane Pfeifer vs Laura Kang / Jennifer Gurske-DePerio6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCathy English / Pamela Rauh vs Aimee Leberer / Lu Liu6-3, 6-3
2023-01-27vs BaileyLost 12
L#1 DoublesMolly Connerton / Maddie Robinson vs Mary-Ann Jolley / Heather Harmon4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Pfeifer / Kathleen Banks vs Bridget Richardson / Nadine Bartels5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCathy English / Pamela Rauh vs Patricia McGrath / Kelley Vanslander6-1, 6-4
2023-01-14vs BUF: StohlLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Watson / Maddie Robinson vs Erin OConnor-Sage / Fernanda Lobo Trindade6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Ruggiero / Kathi Black vs Amy Stohl / Julie Johnson4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCathy English / Holly Powell vs Terry Donahue / Joanne Mendiola6-2, 6-2
2022-12-11vs TodaroLost 01
L#3 DoublesHolly Powell / Pamela Rauh vs Binsy George / Emay Sun2-6, 2-6
2022-12-03vs Love BugsWon 21
L#1 DoublesMolly Connerton / Carol Salvatore vs Samar Al-Alam / Cheryl Athoe4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Ruggiero / Diane Pfeifer vs Amy Handley / Patricia Thielen7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesHolly Powell / Kathi Black vs Cynthia Albrecht / Sarah Lima7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 4.0,3.5,3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BUF: Stohl0612616138
2Todaro0610819162
3Gong069921178
4Ruggiero0671122172
5Love Bugs0671124190
6Bailey0641328197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cheryl Oconnell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.72
Carol Salvatore
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.60
Maddie Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Molly Connerton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Kathleen Banks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Jennifer Ruggiero
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Cathy English
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Diane Pfeifer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Holly Powell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Pamela Rauh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Andrea Abels
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kathi Black
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lauren Watson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy English + Pamela Rauh4447% games−0.1% vs expected
Carol Salvatore + Molly Connerton0537% games−12.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cheryl Oconnell
26W–0L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Carol Salvatore
83W–73L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Maddie Robinson
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Molly Connerton
73W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.49
Kathleen Banks
90W–104L career · 2 lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.37
Jennifer Ruggiero
38W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Cathy English
85W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Diane Pfeifer
30W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Holly Powell
21W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.05
3.5
Pamela Rauh
61W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
38%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Andrea Abels
16W–27L career · 3 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Kathi Black
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Watson
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.