Teams

Phillips/Chattanooga

2026 Mixed Adult 18 & Over-Chattanooga · 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-02vs Farren-Le/ChattanoogaLost 02
L#1 DoublesDiane Hardin / David Gardner vs My Le / Urooj Wali2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanet Lawrence / Glen Urey vs Nelu Farren / Shaun Olsen4-6, 5-7
2026-08-01vs Farren-Le/ChattanoogaLost 12
W#1 DoublesDominique Muhlada / Matt Muhlada vs Mary Neely / Carter Black6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Hardin / Glen Urey vs Kaytie Oldham / Robert Miller4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Lawrence / David Gardner vs Natalie Martin / David Martin4-6, 2-6
2026-07-26vs Farren-Le/ChattanoogaWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatt Muhlada / Dominique Muhlada vs Robert Miller / Kaytie Oldham6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Gardner / Janet Lawrence vs Carter Black / Nelu Farren4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGlen Urey / Mary Miller vs David Martin / Andrea Watson7-5, 6-1
2026-07-11vs Farren-Le/ChattanoogaLost 02
L#2 DoublesGlen Urey / Ann Carroll vs Carter Black / Mary Neely4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLee Carroll / Diane Hardin vs My Le / Urooj Wali1-6, 2-6
2026-06-28Won 20
W#1 DoublesMatt Muhlada / Dominique Muhlada vs Sean Phillips / Andrea Watson7-6, 4-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Phillips / Janet Lawrence vs David Martin / Natalie Martin6-2, 6-4
2026-06-20vs Farren-Le/ChattanoogaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMatt Muhlada / Dominique Muhlada vs Robert Miller / Kaytie Oldham6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGlen Urey / Ann Carroll vs My Le / Nelu Farren2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Matt Muhlada
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Dominique Muhlada
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Glen Urey
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.86
Janet Lawrence
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Diane Hardin
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Lee Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Ann Carroll
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dominique Muhlada + Matt Muhlada7751% games+9.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Muhlada
17W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.11
3
Dominique Muhlada
71W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.10
3
Glen Urey
6W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Janet Lawrence
22W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Diane Hardin
16W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Lee Carroll
15W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Ann Carroll
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.