Teams

C 7.5W NR1 Bartram

2023 NEOTA Combo Fall · NEOTA 7.5 Combo W Fall

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-19vs C 7.5W WE NelsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesYue Bruckner / Amy Grace vs Elaine Niehenke / Alison Lee6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulia Bartram / Deanna Frye vs Shannan Holodinski / Kelley Clegg6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-11-12vs C 7.5W MV1 AranavageWon 21
W#1 DoublesYue Bruckner / Amy Grace vs Donna Rondini / Patricia Mercuri7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Gallagher / Allison Evans vs Lisa Sackett / Allayne Stephans2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Wright / Mary Mays vs Yulia Lyublinski / Pamela Zalba4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-11-05vs OH NEO C 7.5W LightnerWon 21
W#1 DoublesYue Bruckner / Amy Grace vs Hannah Ruddock / Erica Wigton6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Gallagher / Allison Evans vs Heath Mason / Elizabeth Hill6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKathleen Craig / Karen Kneiss vs Elyse Lightner / Katharine Knowlton0-6, 1-6
2023-10-29vs C 7.5W PW2 CiceroSplit 11
W#1 DoublesYue Bruckner / Jean Harsar vs Michelle Kuznicki / Andrea Mattingly6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulia Bartram / Karen Kneiss vs Angela Cicero / Diane Blesi3-6, 6-7
2023-09-17vs C 7.5W SP KirchnerWon 30
W#1 DoublesYue Bruckner / Amy Grace vs Michelle Blanda / Donna Reynolds7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnnette Lipaj / Jean Harsar vs Ellie Effinger / Michelle Sutton6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulia Bartram / Elizabeth Caldera vs Catherine Krummel / Patty Bennett7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA 7.5 Combo W Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Yue Bruckner
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.68
Annette Lipaj
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Deanna Frye
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Allison Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Amy Grace
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Irene Slattery
published 3.5
3.29
Jean Harsar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Lisa Gallagher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Caldera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Mary Mays
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.16
Julia Bartram
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Karen Kneiss
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Harsar + Yue Bruckner11368% games+18.3% vs expected
Annette Lipaj + Jean Harsar6356% games+10.3% vs expected
Amy Grace + Yue Bruckner17266% games+9.5% vs expected
Yue Bruckner + Julia Bartram11264% games+7.2% vs expected
Jean Harsar + Amy Grace8655% games+6.5% vs expected
Irene Slattery + Jean Harsar91549% games+6.2% vs expected
Deanna Frye + Annette Lipaj9759% games+6.2% vs expected
Annette Lipaj + Yue Bruckner11064% games+5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yue Bruckner
199W–79L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Annette Lipaj
49W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Deanna Frye
35W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Allison Evans
96W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Amy Grace
186W–123L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Irene Slattery
72W–79L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Jean Harsar
90W–107L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Lisa Gallagher
81W–87L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Elizabeth Caldera
64W–45L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mary Mays
68W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Julia Bartram
115W–125L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
Karen Kneiss
67W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.