Teams

JTC 18 - Love

2025 Alachua Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-26vs WS - TomasiWon 31
W#1 DoublesMichelle Burns / Kristin Graham vs Diane Adkins / Ivana Simic7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesIdalhi Barnes-marrero vs Morgan Cade6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMeghann Able vs Stephanie Portillo4-6, 3-1
W#3 DoublesJennison Searcy / Linda Vaughn vs Terry Rodriguez / Corinne Tomasi7-6, 6-2
2025-07-01vs WS - TomasiWon 10
W#2 DoublesBlythe Karow / Nancy Smith vs Stephanie Portillo / Cindi Harvey6-4, 6-3
2025-06-30vs DB GerlingSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBlythe Karow / Linda Vaughn vs Jill Shea / Mary Butterworth1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTiffany Schmidt / Maria Zaldivar vs Diana Butler / Shannon Sumerlin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-28vs Alachua/ParadiseBlack/18&over 3.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaria Zaldivar / Maria Su vs Camille Pauly / Raksha Ramkissoon2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Rebecca Long
published
3.07
Michelle Burns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Cassie Johnson
published 3
2.90
Tiani Fuller
published
2.88
Marisa Rodriguez
published
2.76
Linda Vaughn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Meghann Able
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.71
Blythe Karow
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Jennison Searcy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Tiffany Schmidt
published
2.59
Kristin Graham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Maria Zaldivar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Laura Bernheim
published
Idalhi Barnes-marrero
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marisa Rodriguez + Michelle Burns404 matchesnot enough data
Maria Zaldivar + Blythe Karow044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Long
24W–28L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Michelle Burns
26W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Cassie Johnson
20W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Tiani Fuller
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Marisa Rodriguez
28W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
2.88
Linda Vaughn
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Meghann Able
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Blythe Karow
45W–105L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Jennison Searcy
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Tiffany Schmidt
1W–14L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Kristin Graham
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Maria Zaldivar
90W–150L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Laura Bernheim
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Idalhi Barnes-marrero
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.