Teams

Camilla/Shiver

2025 Flint River USTA MXD 18 & Over - Summer · MXD 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.69 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-30vs Bainbridge/HeardWon 10
W#4 DoublesKelley Corbari / Coy Chambers vs Becky Heard / Joe McGlincy4-1
2025-07-27vs Thomasville/ThriffileyLost 02
L#3 DoublesBecky Bush / Coy Chambers vs George Thomas Harrison / Anna Lee6-7, 2-6
L#4 DoublesBrian Bellamy / Lee Lemay vs Thomas Harrison / Kim Thriffiley4-6, 3-6
2025-06-21vs Thomasville/ThriffileyWon 10
W#3 DoublesErica Hilliard / Brian Bellamy vs Anna Lee / Cole Pollock3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MXD 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Austin York
published 4
3.87
Erica Hilliard
published
3.86
Matthew Hilliard
published
3.68
Nikki Hall
published
3.67
Coy Chambers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.57
Renee Vaughn
published
3.56
Brian Bellamy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Edmund Wood
published
3.40
Bobby York
published 4
3.40
Kelley Corbari
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Lee Lemay
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Becky Bush
published 3.5
2.72
Carol Shiver
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelley Corbari + Becky Bush7268% games+8.5% vs expected
Erica Hilliard + Matthew Hilliard5260% games+0.8% vs expected
Coy Chambers + Brian Bellamy2645% gamesnot enough data
Austin York + Nikki Hall303 matchesnot enough data
Lee Lemay + Edmund Wood213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Austin York
6W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
Erica Hilliard
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.87
Matthew Hilliard
13W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Nikki Hall
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Coy Chambers
71W–99L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
Renee Vaughn
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Brian Bellamy
131W–146L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
Edmund Wood
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
4
Bobby York
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
3.5
Kelley Corbari
177W–180L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Lee Lemay
45W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Becky Bush
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3
Carol Shiver
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.