Teams

SCC-Franks

2024 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-23vs Westwood-WaylandLost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Broaddus / Sarah Capozello vs Patricia Bishop / Charles Wayland4-6, 1-6
2024-03-23vs ACAC-FulcherLost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Capozello / J Lafors vs Christopher Chandler / Lindsay Bazydlo7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-03-09vs Westwood-ColemanSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDavid Scheetz / Sarah Capozello vs Katherine Coleman / Michael Kord7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDrew Lineberger / Caroline Andrews vs Christine Albrecht / Kory Painter2-6, 3-6
2024-02-17vs MAC-MessmerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSarah Capozello / David Scheetz vs Courtney Greiner / Benjamin Andrews5-7, 3-5
W#3 DoublesDrew Lineberger / Caroline Andrews vs Heath Flohre / Kimberly Livingston7-6, 4-4
2024-01-20vs Hermitage-WilliamsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah Capozello / J Lafors vs Pam Walsh / KENJI SAKAMOTO6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2024-01-13vs CCV-FraizerLost 01
L#2 DoublesSarah Capozello / J Lafors vs Ashley Millen / William Carli1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Lauren Palmer
published
3.96
Tamara Beck Jacquet
published 4.5
3.89
J Lafors
published
3.88
Laney Hyatt
published
3.79
Richard Lloyd
published
3.77
Sarah Capozello
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.68
Megan Shrestha
published
3.40
Christopher Doern
published 3.5
3.29
Brian Consolvo
published 3.5
Dean Deaver
published 3.5
3.11
Caroline Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Drew Lineberger
published
Karen Franks
published
Scott Broaddus
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Palmer
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Tamara Beck Jacquet
59W–106L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.96
J Lafors
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.89
Laney Hyatt
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
Richard Lloyd
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Sarah Capozello
101W–101L career · 10 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Megan Shrestha
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Christopher Doern
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Brian Consolvo
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Dean Deaver
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Caroline Andrews
69W–66L career · 2 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.11
Drew Lineberger
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Franks
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Broaddus
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.