Teams

Ja.Martin18C

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-10-11vs Je.Komes18C7.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesMcKinsey Blount / Maggie Patterson vs Madison Cullipher / Amanda Mueller6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer London / Dana Rawls vs Ashley Weeks / Emily Spencer6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJamie Martin / Sara Mazurak vs Candace Hughes / Keshia Green6-4, 6-3
2025-10-04vs Pa.Hankerson18CWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Hollis / Kara Rectenwald vs Stacie White / Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMcKinsey Blount / Whitney Leab vs Leigh Breischaft / Paulina Powierza6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTori Sutler / Korri Styers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-27vs Er.Wynia18C7.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMcKinsey Blount / Maggie Patterson vs Susan Marie Hill / Cari DeCandia6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKara Rectenwald / Jessica Brock vs Julie Rogers / Jennifer Kuzma7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTori Sutler / Kelly Hollis vs Ayako Otsuka / Cary Armstrong6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-09-13vs Me.Everitt18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTori Sutler / Jessica Brock vs Caroline Yu / Rebecca Reynolds7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Hollis / McKinsey Blount vs Anna Bentley / McKenzie Keenan Osman6-1, 6-3
2025-09-06vs Am.Hobbs18CWon 20
W#2 DoublesLaura Cox / Tori Sutler vs Nikki DAmbrose / Nicole Peterson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDana Rawls / Korri Styers vs Adriana Craft / Rachel Tam6-1, 6-3
2025-08-30vs Je.Komes18C7.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesLisa ONeill / Sara Mazurak vs Keshia Green / Emily Spencer6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaggie Patterson / McKinsey Blount vs Katie Evans / Alyssa Evrard6-1, 6-0
2025-08-23vs Pa.Hankerson18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesTori Sutler / Jessica Brock vs Stacie White / Pamela Hankerson6-0, 6-2
2025-08-16vs Er.Wynia18C7.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesMcKinsey Blount / Maggie Patterson vs Ayako Otsuka / Jennifer Kuzma6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSara Mazurak / Kara Rectenwald vs Julie Rogers / Cary Armstrong4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTori Sutler / Laura Cox vs Lindsay Murdock / Naomi Rodrigues4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-09vs Me.Everitt18CLost 12
L#1 DoublesTori Sutler / Sara Mazurak vs Caroline Yu / Anna Bentley4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMcKinsey Blount / Laura Cox vs Valerie Szwarc / Melyssa Kemp6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDana Rawls / Whitney Leab vs Zana Piric / Allyson Schneider3-6, 4-6
2025-08-02vs Am.Hobbs18CWon 21
W#1 DoublesMcKinsey Blount / Jennifer London vs Leigh Barter / Lauren Redmond6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKara Rectenwald / Jessica Brock vs Kara Horton / Amy Hobbs6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDana Rawls / Kelly Hollis vs Nikki DAmbrose / Adriana Craft2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
McKinsey Blount
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.01
Tori Sutler
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.00
Lisa ONeill
published
3.87
Kara Rectenwald
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.56
Maggie Patterson
published
3.55
Jamie Martin
published 4
3.53
Dana Rawls
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Laura Cox
published
3.47
Kelly Hollis
published
3.46
Sara Mazurak
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Jessica Brock
published
3.31
Whitney Leab
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Korri Styers
published
3.16
Carrie Rice
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

McKinsey Blount + Tori Sutler9069% games+19.4% vs expected
Tori Sutler + Lisa ONeill6061% games+5.7% vs expected
Kelly Hollis + Jessica Brock4358% games−3.6% vs expected
Lisa ONeill + Jamie Martin314 matchesnot enough data
Kara Rectenwald + Lisa ONeill303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
McKinsey Blount
65W–14L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
4.35
4
Tori Sutler
193W–55L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
Lisa ONeill
24W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Kara Rectenwald
73W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
Maggie Patterson
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Jamie Martin
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Dana Rawls
129W–111L career · 4 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Laura Cox
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Kelly Hollis
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Sara Mazurak
168W–65L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Jessica Brock
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Whitney Leab
59W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Korri Styers
3W–11L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Carrie Rice
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.